Should the new Charger get Challenger's Scat Pack Trimline?
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Should the new Charger get Challenger's Scat Pack Trimline?
Do you think that Dodge will offer a Scat Pack trimline, similar to the one offered for the 2015 Challenger for the 2015/2016 Charger?
http://www.torquenews.com/106/2015-d...cat-pack-model
Regarding the new Charger.
http://www.torquenews.com/106/2015-d...cat-pack-model
Regarding the new Charger.
What is someone to do if they want something that has more than the 370hp 5.7L Charger R/T , but they can’t deal with the huge price tag of the 600+ horsepower Charger SRT?
This same problem was presented with the 2015 Dodge Challenger and to solve the problem with the brawny 2-door Mopar muscle car, the company introduced the Scat Pack trimline. The Challenger Scat Pack wears R/T badging but in terms of the working components, this new trimline is closer to the 2014 Challenger SRT than it is any of the Challenger R/T models – and that includes the powerful 6.4L Hemi V8. The Challenger Scat Pack bridges the massive gap in both price and performance between the 5.7L Hemi R/T and 6.2L Hellcat SRT packages and with the 2015-2016 Charger having that same gap – there is a perfect opportunity to introduce a Scat Pack trimline for the 4-door Mopar muscle car as well.
This same problem was presented with the 2015 Dodge Challenger and to solve the problem with the brawny 2-door Mopar muscle car, the company introduced the Scat Pack trimline. The Challenger Scat Pack wears R/T badging but in terms of the working components, this new trimline is closer to the 2014 Challenger SRT than it is any of the Challenger R/T models – and that includes the powerful 6.4L Hemi V8. The Challenger Scat Pack bridges the massive gap in both price and performance between the 5.7L Hemi R/T and 6.2L Hellcat SRT packages and with the 2015-2016 Charger having that same gap – there is a perfect opportunity to introduce a Scat Pack trimline for the 4-door Mopar muscle car as well.
