4th Gen Ram Tech 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Ram, Chevy, Ford towing contest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2013 | 10:38 PM
  #1  
LVRR's Avatar
LVRR
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 255
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
Default Ram, Chevy, Ford towing contest

Thought you may be interested. Not the Rams top tow rig, but interesting info on the big block engines.

 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2013 | 02:23 AM
  #2  
AZdave's Avatar
AZdave
Professional
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 170
Likes: 1
From: Oregon
Default

A "king of the hill" towing test with the 3.55 instead of the 3.92? Clearly the test was rigged to fail as the others were 3.73 and you are limited to the 6speed with the Express - obviously a handicapped choice. This test is B.S.
Oh, and 13mpg combined on the Ford? Laughable...
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2013 | 11:25 AM
  #3  
shieldsdb's Avatar
shieldsdb
Rookie
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Ft Stewart GA
Default

1. The moment he said "GM sent me out here", the test was already done.

2. Epic V8 test. Hardly.

3. Was the AC on for the 2nd GM run?

4. How long did it take Ford and GM to catch up to Ram in the power department?

5. What about overall ride comfort?

6. Not once did he mention how the truck handled the load behind it.

I seem to remember someone saying that 35 to 70 was the most important time for accelerating w/ a trailer.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2013 | 11:29 AM
  #4  
Duso02's Avatar
Duso02
Captain
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 566
Likes: 2
From: Western PA
Default

Originally Posted by AZdave
A "king of the hill" towing test with the 3.55 instead of the 3.92? Clearly the test was rigged to fail as the others were 3.73 and you are limited to the 6speed with the Express - obviously a handicapped choice. This test is B.S.
Oh, and 13mpg combined on the Ford? Laughable...
They corrected that, it had the 3.92 gear set.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2013 | 12:15 PM
  #5  
706jim's Avatar
706jim
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Default

There was certainly enough publicity for the Ford Ecoboost V6 but I often wondered why the 406hp engine was never mentioned. And for these trailering tests, all three trucks should have had two or three runs to make the results truly valid.
The Chev was impressive though.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2013 | 09:14 PM
  #6  
POWER SEDAN's Avatar
POWER SEDAN
Captain
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default

Love they compared apples to apples... where? Let's brag about the interiors on top model GM and Ford, then utilize a Express model to compare interiors for Ram. Apparently the Laramie was overly impressive for the competition.

Secondly, the Hemi's low to mid range power isn't utilized efficiently when throttle is 100% from a dead stop. Anyone who runs 1/4 or 1/8 straights with modern day Hemi's can justify this statement. I've never launched more 65% throttle or better out of the hole at the strip with my Charger, huge difference. HUGE!
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2013 | 10:07 AM
  #7  
LU229's Avatar
LU229
Banned
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by POWER SEDAN
Love they compared apples to apples... where? Let's brag about the interiors on top model GM and Ford, then utilize a Express model to compare interiors for Ram. Apparently the Laramie was overly impressive for the competition.

Secondly, the Hemi's low to mid range power isn't utilized efficiently when throttle is 100% from a dead stop. Anyone who runs 1/4 or 1/8 straights with modern day Hemi's can justify this statement. I've never launched more 65% throttle or better out of the hole at the strip with my Charger, huge difference. HUGE!
Well said...!!!! Agree...!
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2013 | 10:30 PM
  #8  
Dusty48's Avatar
Dusty48
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 318
Likes: 1
From: Rochester, New York
Default What a Sophomoric Test!

Yes, any 5.7 Ram owner knows that this test doesn't tell the whole story. When I'm towing, a truck with better 0-60 times is not very helpful. I need the power to merge and accelerate on hills.

The 5.7 doesn't make the power until the intake manifold switches to the short path. And when in Drive the 545RFE uses the taller 2nd gear. You only use the two 2nd gears sequentially when Tow/Haul is selected.

I've trailered three ATVs plus passengers with a group, one of which had an older Chevy 6.2. Equally loaded there are hills on Interstate 86 where our little test showed the 6.2 had no such advantage.

I see that GM claims 20 MPG highway with the new Corvette motor, which would be a heck of a lot better than 6.2s in previous years. And you see the penalty the 6.2 Ford pays in gas mileage when your not loaded. On a steady drive I get 20-22 MPG easily.

I haven't been in a 2014 Silverado, but I have been in recent Fords and Chevys (albeit, with smaller motors) and both of their automatic transmissions seem to have very inconsistent shifting problems. No such problems with any 545RFE Hemi I've ever been in.

Lastly, is it my imagination? It seemed like the Ram was quieter than both the 2014 Chevy & Ford. Chevy ads seem to be touting how quiet they are.

Bests,
Dusty
2010 Ram Big Horn 1500 Quad Cab 2WD, 5.7 Hemi, 545RFE, 3.92 LSD, factory dual exhaust, 20” wheels. Now at: 91,000 miles.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:12 AM.