View Poll Results: A poll
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll
Should the SRT-4 be considered a neon?
#11
10-05-2004, 07:13 PM
Grand Champion
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 45th parallel, MI
Posts: 5,468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Should the SRT-4 be considered a neon?
Okay, now don't be silly. I realize the PT uses the same frame, but you'd have to be blind to not notice how strikingly similar the neon and SRT4 look. Maybe because they are the same thing except slightly different body and engine. The PT in no way, shape, or form resembles a neon.
#12
10-05-2004, 08:08 PM
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alamosa, Colorado (200 yards from the Rio Grande)
Posts: 24,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Should the SRT-4 be considered a neon?
The SRT-4 has about as much in common with the PT cruiser as it does a neon. The PT cruiser is available with the 2.4 ltr turbo engine just like the SRT-4. The neon is available ( for one year, in 2005) in a look alike package but without the 2.4 ltr turbo engine as well as the other go-fast parts.
It'll be interesting to see what DCX dreams up for these vehicles in the years to come!!!
It'll be interesting to see what DCX dreams up for these vehicles in the years to come!!!
