1st Gen Dakota Tech 1987 - 1996 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 1st Gen Dakota.

Good starter not working!

Old Jun 5, 2009 | 07:59 PM
  #1  
veejr's Avatar
veejr
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: United States,Eastern Ohio
Unhappy Good starter not working!

Hello all I've a 1990 dakota. The starter has been rebuilt and checked out as good. The truck has been sitting for months. During a very cold snap my fuel pump died and the stater gave up trying. I've replaced the fuel pump and had the starter rebuilt. I've also tried a junkyard starter which tests good. I hit the key and hear the bendix push but no starter turning. I cleaned up many connectors under the hood and it did start once. Then back to the click. Battery is fully charged. Any idea what the problem could be?
 
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 08:08 PM
  #2  
ZackN920's Avatar
ZackN920
Record Breaker
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 1
From: Stephenson County, IL
Default

What exactly do you mean by 'bendex push'?
 
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 09:27 PM
  #3  
95_318SLT's Avatar
95_318SLT
Champion
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,839
Likes: 5
From: Apex, NC
Default

You need to check the battery under load. Just because it reads over 12 volts without a load on it doesn't mean it won't drop down too low when a load is placed on it. I've had that happen with a battery before.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2009 | 10:42 AM
  #4  
veejr's Avatar
veejr
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: United States,Eastern Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by ZackN920
What exactly do you mean by 'bendex push'?
I mean the obvious clang when the gear is thrust to the flywheel.

Originally Posted by 95_318SLT
You need to check the battery under load. Just because it reads over 12 volts without a load on it doesn't mean it won't drop down too low when a load is placed on it. I've had that happen with a battery before.
I had considered that and tried with a battery charger on 40amp boost and it did the same. In thinking more about this overnight. I had to work all night. I'm thinking it may be the positive battery cable is bad. It feels solid and both ends are clean and tight but a previous owner added a crimp on connector at the starter end. I'll get a new cable in soon and try that. Does this sound right?
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2009 | 11:24 AM
  #5  
1989_DD's Avatar
1989_DD
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

I had something similar on an '89 with the battery cables, but I was able to get it started more than once by twisting them around a bit and having someone else starting it. You could give that a try. I ended up replacing the terminals and the problem was corrected. When I looked at the old original terminals the wire hole inside was too malformed after so many years....
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2009 | 02:35 PM
  #6  
stellar's Avatar
stellar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

If it is the nippendenso starter 3.9 I suspect you may have over tightened the battery wire on the post. If the post turns even a little when you tighten the nut it can cause the contact in the starter to move and no longer sit flat resulting in a bad contact across the contacts. Pull the starter and open the flat cover held on by 3 screws. See if the contacts are flat and the round copper strike plate is contacting both contacts evenly.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 10:13 PM
  #7  
veejr's Avatar
veejr
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: United States,Eastern Ohio
Default

Problem found and solved. There was an aftermarket end on the positive cable at the starter. It was rusted and loose. I cleaned it up and cut back the cable. Reinstalled the end crimped and soldered. Bingo she fires right up!
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:01 AM.