1st Gen Dakota Tech 1987 - 1996 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 1st Gen Dakota.

pre-running a 1st gen

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 10:40 PM
  #11  
95_318SLT's Avatar
95_318SLT
Champion
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,839
Likes: 5
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Hahns5.2
People commonly think of a 2wd with long travel when they hear the word pre-runner but the general idea is any vehicle used to pre-run the course.
You're right. I guess we can thank toyota for that one! :P Read my post above this one and I do a better job of expaining what I originally meant.

BTW, that dakota is 2wd :P
 

Last edited by 95_318SLT; Oct 22, 2009 at 10:52 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 11:03 PM
  #12  
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 3
From: Battle Ground WA
Default

Originally Posted by 95_318SLT

BTW, that dakota is 2wd :P
I know, I was just showing an example of a TIB swap, which is very similar to TTB.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 01:16 PM
  #13  
1shotjake's Avatar
1shotjake
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wi!
Default

I like the TTB and see that it can be built pretty beefy, plus it wouldn't require coilvers (unless I could somehow fit coils AND a shock n the a-arm) but it looks like it could be a pain to get set and that it might eat tires pretty quickly...

then again, long travel ifs would be a lot of work... I guess i'll have to read more, and price things out.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 02:06 PM
  #14  
skyshark186's Avatar
skyshark186
Captain
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
Default

TTB's CAN be good, but they can also suck horribly. They usually have tire wear issues, and if not done properly can break quite easily, although the idea behind it is inherently no weaker than IFS. Theres quite a bit of engineering to get TTB working correctly, and most people ignore that(including many lift manufacturers)when they build these axles.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 02:19 PM
  #15  
1shotjake's Avatar
1shotjake
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wi!
Default

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/FOX-1...item2a020695c4

No springs, but I figured that's a great price for two. Is a 2" di. shock going to be too small? I noticed it says for buggy's ect. I figure I won't be doing any comp. crawling, would those still be too light-duty?
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 02:50 PM
  #16  
95_318SLT's Avatar
95_318SLT
Champion
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,839
Likes: 5
From: Apex, NC
Default

To be honest, I have no idea! I've never researched building these kinds of vehicles. Maybe someone else on here has an answer for you, but your best bet might be search offroad topic forums where people discuss prerunners.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 05:10 PM
  #17  
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 3
From: Battle Ground WA
Default

Originally Posted by skyshark186
TTB's CAN be good, but they can also suck horribly. They usually have tire wear issues, and if not done properly can break quite easily, although the idea behind it is inherently no weaker than IFS. Theres quite a bit of engineering to get TTB working correctly, and most people ignore that(including many lift manufacturers)when they build these axles.
Proper Steering angles are important. It's really not that hard set up TTB. I align mine myself using my eyes and a tape measure and I run straight down the road and have never had tire wear issues.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 05:37 PM
  #18  
skyshark186's Avatar
skyshark186
Captain
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
Default

Originally Posted by Hahns5.2
Proper Steering angles are important. It's really not that hard set up TTB. I align mine myself using my eyes and a tape measure and I run straight down the road and have never had tire wear issues.

While that may work for you it doesnt mean its the rule. I know just as many people with bad angles as I do with good. I cant tell you the number of ford ttb axles I know that look like a tee pee around town.

Again...Im not arguing against the idea. Merely pointing out areas of interest.
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 12:55 PM
  #19  
Deathkota's Avatar
Deathkota
Amateur
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

There are plenty of 4x4 prerunners out there. I think Long travel suspension, particularly IFS, and big coilover shocks and air bumps are some defining features of a prerunner. It really helps control the vehicle at high speeds when the fronts are spinning.

Longer arms are fairly easy to fabricate, a 2wd Dakota prerunner would not be rocket science to a builder. Especially with the fenders available to these trucks.

A 4wd truck poses the issue of longer axles. Not impossible, just more expensive.

I have a 4runner that is sort of a hybrid. I wanted to retain IFS, but still go fast and have more travel for crawling. Longer arms is THE best way to get travel out of IFS. Anything else compromises geometry or cv angles.

Here are some pics of the Deathrunner:


http://roughroadfabrication.com/death_runner.html


Video:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tK0bcMR8ro

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ps8C6lh7x8E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFcEK764BBc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tY7SHyqZucQ


It was also featured in the Feb 2010 issue of Toyota 4wd owner magazine:


http://www.yotatech.com/f5/congrats-deathrunner-202103/
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 PM.