Hey guys...

I have a 96 dakota with the 3.9 in it, and im going to put a new muffler under it...

I cant really decide tho, if i want a cherrybomb, or some sort of flowmaster...

They both sound good to me, especially the flowmasters, but im not sure if they will sound much different on a V6.

So, i guess im posting just to ask you guys... Does anyone on here (okay, okay, who on here) have either behind a 3.9?? What do you think??

And the other thing... The tailpipe rusted off on the previous owner. What happens if i dont replace that, with the muffler?? Thanks everyone... Im new at this... This is my first truck...

the rusted tail pipe should be fine. i broke mine off on a snowbank march of 09'. it'll make everything louder though

without a tailpipe, you'll be sucking in exhaust and treating everyone around you at stoplights to a big dose of carbon monoxide. if you want it louder, try a pipe without a muffler...could get a ticket, tho.

Build yourself a custom "H" or "X" pipe exaust that flows into flowmasters and dumps out each side befor the rear tire. That would make you a BAMF. Infact i going to go coppyright this idea....

not allowed i already did lol
check out youtube for sounds on exhaust, Lanse... heres a few...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K-KbEuGQIY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmmeb...eature=related

I like the flowmaster 40. I wouldn't know how it would sound on the 3.9 though.

the tail pipe is the part of exhaust pipe after the muffler. even with the muffler on and no tailpipe these truck can be pretty loud, trust me

been there, done that

according to those videos I like the flowmasters sound better, but thats just my opinion.

Is that copyrited with or with out long tube headers?

how nope got stock headers but i gotta chop up my exhuast cause i got a leak somewhere and hey a nother midwestern badass lol