1st Gen Dakota Tech 1987 - 1996 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 1st Gen Dakota.

Lowering both ends of rear springs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 20, 2011 | 09:22 PM
  #1  
bill55az's Avatar
bill55az
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: AZ and Utah
Talking Lowering both ends of rear springs

Was looking at my 89 2wd and wondering about how to lower it just a bit....
I have looked at lowering by shackle flips, blocks under the axle, and don't like either.
If I have to remove the leaf spring rear frame mounts anyway, why not remove the front mounts as well, and have both ends adjustable. I am only looking at 2, maybe 3", and most of the methods I read about are 4" or more....way too much. I just want the rear to be level with the front. Seems to me that a lot of lowering at just one end will cause pinion angle issues, but lowering both ends of the leaf springs will make for less angle change.
I have access to a major machine shop at reasonable prices. They can cut and bend for me...all I have to do is bring them a mockup..
 

Last edited by bill55az; Nov 20, 2011 at 09:48 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2011 | 10:20 PM
  #2  
Crazy4x4RT's Avatar
Crazy4x4RT
Hall Of Fame
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,923
Likes: 19
From: NM
Default

The easiest way is to remove a few leaf springs. That will lower it, but heavy hauling capacity is gone. Although with it lowered your limiting your hauling capacity due to bottoming out on a speed bump if you have anything more than a microwave in the bed. Useless!
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2011 | 10:55 PM
  #3  
bill55az's Avatar
bill55az
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: AZ and Utah
Default

a few? there are only 4, and one of them is the overload.....

Not going that route....already have the lightest rear springs available from the factory. It won't be used for hauling heavy stuff.....I have a full size half ton pickup for that...
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2011 | 10:59 PM
  #4  
Crazy4x4RT's Avatar
Crazy4x4RT
Hall Of Fame
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,923
Likes: 19
From: NM
Default

Drop the overload that is totally unneeded then and drop the smallest leaf. The upper 2 will be fine on their own.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2011 | 11:14 PM
  #5  
bill55az's Avatar
bill55az
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: AZ and Utah
Default

I believe that is worth a try......After I get it all put back together, and road worthy, and licensed, I will try it...
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2011 | 09:05 AM
  #6  
dobaroy's Avatar
dobaroy
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Why not jack up on the t-bars to bring the front up to match the rear?
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2011 | 09:30 AM
  #7  
bill55az's Avatar
bill55az
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: AZ and Utah
Default

Originally Posted by dobaroy
Why not jack up on the t-bars to bring the front up to match the rear?
it is not 4x4, has coils in front....new coils that I just installed last week.

It was a 4 cylinder/manual trans truck, will be a 5.9 v8/auto trans truck....
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2011 | 04:30 PM
  #8  
Sauxon's Avatar
Sauxon
Professional
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, MB
Default

i know that you can get a new spring pack made to lift up the rear, maybe you could get one made to lower it?
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2011 | 08:31 PM
  #9  
bill55az's Avatar
bill55az
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: AZ and Utah
Default

Actually, you can trim the ends of the lesser spring leafs to lower the load rating....common load ratings for dakota rear ends are approximately, IIRC, 2300, 2700, 3000, and 3600, depending on year and configuration...so you can measure the lengths of the lesser leafs and trim accordingly....The lightest years are the early years....

But I am almost sure that such trimming will not be enough. I won't know til the truck competely reassembled..
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 PM.