1st Gen Durango 1998 - 2003 Durango's

32 or 16 tooth crank?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2008 | 05:44 PM
  #1  
Ohno's Avatar
Ohno
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 1
Default 32 or 16 tooth crank?

how in the world can i find out? Seems to be the same VIN code...
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2008 | 06:05 PM
  #2  
Ohno's Avatar
Ohno
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 1
Default

no one knows? I blew my engine last night and i really need to get a new one in as fast as possible. google's not helping, they're both vin code N, i'm reading something about afront carrier mounting boss, but i hae absolutely NO clue what that could possibly be.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2008 | 06:25 PM
  #3  
hydrashocker's Avatar
hydrashocker
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,228
Likes: 19
From: Riverton, UT
Default

Well first it sounds like you have a 4.7L?

If you want info you need to leave more info. Engine, year, 2wd/4X4???????

Second give it some time. We just don't sit around all day and wait for threads to start.

Third. Why not just rebuild it?????
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2008 | 06:34 PM
  #4  
hydrashocker's Avatar
hydrashocker
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,228
Likes: 19
From: Riverton, UT
Default

1999-2003 used a 16 tooth reluctor ring and the 2004-2008 use a 32 tooth reluctor "MECHANICALLY" are the tone rings at the rear end of the crank shaft.


By the way, this is a 4.7L right?
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2008 | 06:35 PM
  #5  
Ohno's Avatar
Ohno
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 1
Default

My apologies. It's a 2002, 4.7L, 4WD. I need the fastest option possible as i use this for work. I'm not gonna do the work myself cause i have zero patience for nuts and bolts. I'll do all the electrical work in the world but keeping track of a trillion screws drives me nuts.

Background on the issue. I let it go way too long without an oil change, i know i know...., and it developed a tick. I assumed it was a lifter and decided i could live with it. it's not the healthiest thing to do, but i didn't have the moeny or time to get it repaired. Last night i'm driving and the ticking changes to a deep grumble and i have an extreme loss in power. Looks like i should have made the time or borrowed the money to fix the small problem, cause these engines aren't cheap...

Once again, sorry for the snobby posts, i'm just flipping out looking at prices, figuring out how i'm going to work while my truck's out of comission, etc.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #6  
Ohno's Avatar
Ohno
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 1
Default

Everything i'm reading says 2002.5 used the 32 tooth. I just got an answer from dodge.justanswer.com.

Mopar expert says you can tell from the engine computer. "Hi. You are correct, the tone wheels can be different. The 2002.5 Durangos were the first to get the new NGC type engine controller. They used the different tone wheel. To tell if you have the newer or older one is easy. Find your engine controller in the engine compartment on the passenger fender. If you have 3 32 way connectors on the controller you have the older Chrysler JTEC controller, if you have four 38 way connectors you have the later NGC. If you try to install the wrong engine in yours it won't start. You would have to tear the engine down and swap the cam sprocket tone wheels to get it to run."
hopefully that's not an infringement on their website... didn't read the disclaimers.
 

Last edited by hydrashocker; Nov 1, 2008 at 06:52 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2008 | 06:46 PM
  #7  
hydrashocker's Avatar
hydrashocker
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,228
Likes: 19
From: Riverton, UT
Default

These 4.7L are SOB's to work on.

If your in a hury then I would go for a long block. Maybe performamce motor?
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2008 | 06:51 PM
  #8  
Ohno's Avatar
Ohno
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 1
Default

I wanted to pull the head off and check it out but the amount of crap on top really turned me off, especially with my disdain for keeping everything organized.

I had another question along the same lines though... Does the 5.9 bolt up to the 4.7 tranny? I've seen a ton of lower mileage 5.9s cheaper than higher mileage 4.7s. Only issue is I'm rather sure "engine assemblies" are missing exh/intae manifolds, pumps, yada yada. Whereas if i got a 4.7 i could just have the shop swap all mine over.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2008 | 06:56 PM
  #9  
hydrashocker's Avatar
hydrashocker
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,228
Likes: 19
From: Riverton, UT
Default

They are two different motor blocks, PCM, motor mounts, trans and yada

They won't interchange.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2008 | 06:58 PM
  #10  
Ohno's Avatar
Ohno
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 1
Default

I can't afford the drop in mileage anway. hehe
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 PM.