1st Gen Durango 1998 - 2003 Durango's

Poor fuel mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2009 | 09:14 AM
  #21  
Durango03's Avatar
Durango03
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Clayton, NC
Default

Yes, def. change the plugs to Champion Truck or Iridium. I would also ATLEAST drop a K&N filter in place of your OEM. Make sure your tire pressure is accurate as well. I would make the switch to Synthetic oil if you havent already.

Just for reference, I just took a 3 hour trip and ran No Les than 85 MPH and got @ 400 miles on 1 tank... I think it averaged out to be @ 18-19 mpg. I thought that was good for as fast as I was going.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2009 | 03:02 PM
  #22  
hydrashocker's Avatar
hydrashocker
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,228
Likes: 19
From: Riverton, UT
Default

Originally Posted by IndyDurango
I loved Rocky Horror Picture Show.

I bet Hydra would make a good "Brad"



IndyD
Your the one that LOVES the Rocky Horror Picture Show........
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2009 | 10:20 PM
  #23  
tmmhealthy's Avatar
tmmhealthy
Registered User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: MAssachusetts
Default

I have an 04 Durango - bought it used two months ago with 33,000 miles on it. I have been averaging 12 mpg each and every week driving back and forth to work (7 miles each way with several traffic lights) and on short trips during week-ends. Then last week, I drove to VA and back to MA on Route 95 and was pleased to average 20 to 21 miles per gallon!

After returning home, I changed from petroleum oil to Mobil 1 synthetic and I ordered a K&N air filter drop-in replacement. I'm hoping to increase from 12 mpg to 14 but I'll let you know when I fill-up again.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2009 | 10:26 PM
  #24  
tmmhealthy's Avatar
tmmhealthy
Registered User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: MAssachusetts
Default

Here is a good website for comparing gas mileage among vehicles and engine sizes:

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/mpg/MPG.do
 
Reply
Old May 4, 2009 | 05:49 PM
  #25  
hydrashocker's Avatar
hydrashocker
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,228
Likes: 19
From: Riverton, UT
Default

The 04 is bound to get more than the first generation. But then again my motor is bigger that yours.....
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2009 | 07:49 PM
  #26  
MAGIC84's Avatar
MAGIC84
Thread Starter
|
All Star
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Default

Again, I will check with the actual fill up, but so far I am picking up about 20-25 miles per tank. From about 290, now indicating about 310-315. I got about another two-three days before fill up again, but early results look good. I know it may be some other factors but since I haven't made any dramatic changes in my driving habits I am going to give a good bit of credit to the new Bilstein's. I am still in the market for a CAI but I would say that good riding shocks are a good player in fuel economy.
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2009 | 11:02 PM
  #27  
IndyDurango's Avatar
IndyDurango
Champion
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,822
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
Default

I didn't say anything last mention because I though I had read it wrong... however now with the statement coming up twice... I must say you are the first person I can ever recall giving kudos to new shocks for any mileage gains much less the big gains you are seeing.

My money is on better fuel with the spring blends/summer blends/winter blends, etc WAY MORE so than on any set of shocks.

JMHO!

IndyDurango
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2009 | 11:51 PM
  #28  
shrpshtr325's Avatar
shrpshtr325
THE ULTI-MOD
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,797
Likes: 36
From: Union NJ
Default

Originally Posted by IndyDurango
I didn't say anything last mention because I though I had read it wrong... however now with the statement coming up twice... I must say you are the first person I can ever recall giving kudos to new shocks for any mileage gains much less the big gains you are seeing.

My money is on better fuel with the spring blends/summer blends/winter blends, etc WAY MORE so than on any set of shocks.

JMHO!

IndyDurango

yea thats what i would blame it on too, but again jmho
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2009 | 11:27 PM
  #29  
hydrashocker's Avatar
hydrashocker
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,228
Likes: 19
From: Riverton, UT
Default

Originally Posted by MAGIC84
but so far I am picking up about 20-25 miles per tank. From about 290,
I have to say something..........LOL

Thats an average of 1.111- gallons per mile.....


Those must be some great shocks.......LMFAO
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2009 | 12:51 AM
  #30  
MAGIC84's Avatar
MAGIC84
Thread Starter
|
All Star
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Default

I meant 20-25 MORE miles per tank, so up from 290 to 310-315. I did the fill up today. mileage/range did go up, not quite as much as originally indicated, but still up. Last was 17.0 gals/255 miles so about 15 MPG. This tank was 18.0 gals/300 miles, so just a touch over 16.5 MPG and 45 miles over last tank. I am reasonably happy, and I still credit a portion of it to the new shocks. This was actual fill up mileage not overhead computer mileage.

I had not given to the change to summer blends, and that makes sense. I figured all the summer blends would be out "on the streets" (no pun intended) by now.


I think even though I went up, there is not a lot you can expect from stop/go driving but I am thankful for all the input from the members. I am reasonably satisfied with the improvements however little they are that the shocks provided. With the ride and handling improvement I would be satisfied even if there was no MPG improvement. I say we chalk it up to a combination of events, summer blend fuel and shocks. I will still try the Champion Truck plugs and when financially able a CAI, and exhaust system.

Thanks,

Steve
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 AM.