1st Gen Durango 1998 - 2003 Durango's

Show us your 1st Gen. Durango!

Old Sep 7, 2012 | 08:08 PM
  #811  
shrpshtr325's Avatar
shrpshtr325
THE ULTI-MOD
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,797
Likes: 36
From: Union NJ
Default

moparman, why did you go to a narrower tire?
 
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 11:03 PM
  #812  
MoparMan1991's Avatar
MoparMan1991
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,213
Likes: 2
From: Barksdale AFB, LA
Default

Originally Posted by shrpshtr325
moparman, why did you go to a narrower tire?
Because I went to the one place that is full of complete morons. Let's play "Guess that corporation".


*Spoiler Alert*

It was Wal-Mart.
 

Last edited by MoparMan1991; Sep 8, 2012 at 12:04 AM.
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 11:07 PM
  #813  
that_guy's Avatar
that_guy
Champion
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 44
From: Pittsburgh, PA or Columbia, SC
Default

Originally Posted by shrpshtr325
moparman, why did you go to a narrower tire?
that's actually a good point. by looking at the numbers quickly it appears that the 265/70r16 tires actually have a bigger contact patch than the 235/85r16 tires that you put on. again I didn't actually so the full blown calculation with the arc lengths and all that good stuff, but that's what it seems like in my head.
 
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 07:59 AM
  #814  
shrpshtr325's Avatar
shrpshtr325
THE ULTI-MOD
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,797
Likes: 36
From: Union NJ
Default

you are correct, even if the tire is the same height the width plays a significant role in contact patch

well at least that explains it pretty simply i guess thats a lesson learned
 
Old Sep 9, 2012 | 11:10 AM
  #815  
Ashburn2011's Avatar
Ashburn2011
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

New Durango. 2000 SLT 4wd 4.7
 
Attached Thumbnails Show us your 1st Gen. Durango!-d.jpg  
Old Sep 9, 2012 | 11:11 AM
  #816  
that_guy's Avatar
that_guy
Champion
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 44
From: Pittsburgh, PA or Columbia, SC
Default

looks good! welcome to the boards!
 
Old Sep 9, 2012 | 03:28 PM
  #817  
AlmostThere's Avatar
AlmostThere
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Talking 2001 Dodge Durango 5.9 at 300K

This picture is December of last year when she hit 300K, although now she has 306K. Truck pulled 4 horse trailer all over US with horses and only this month is the first major problem I have had with this truck, all original (except replaced a radiator couple years ago).
 
Attached Thumbnails Show us your 1st Gen. Durango!-2011-12-14_14-39-37_325.jpg  
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 10:28 AM
  #818  
Rawyzf's Avatar
Rawyzf
Professional
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Blaine, MN
Default

Wow, 300K, congrats.
 
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 02:15 PM
  #819  
Lynaugh's Avatar
Lynaugh
Rookie
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 77
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Originally Posted by MoparMan1991
Do a 2" T/S Lift and a 3" PA Body lift. Youll be able to fit bigger tires pretty easily.
I thought you couldnt do a T/S lift on 2WD Durango's. I was going to do one until I found that out because they don't have torsion bars in the front suspension. It has coil springs.
 
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 07:33 PM
  #820  
shrpshtr325's Avatar
shrpshtr325
THE ULTI-MOD
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,797
Likes: 36
From: Union NJ
Default

you are correct t/s lift only works on 4x4 trucks bc the 2wd trucks have coil spring front suspension
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 PM.