1st Gen Durango 1998 - 2003 Durango's

2000 Durango fix, rebuild or replace?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 03:09 AM
  #1  
00 Durango's Avatar
00 Durango
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default 2000 Durango fix, rebuild or replace?

I read a lot on performance inhancements for the 00 druangos 5.2 4x4 SLT's.however I want to ask in a different direction on this "theory" which I use and have proved to people again and again on my 07 Ram 2500 diesel.(525 Hp 925 tq) 25 psi boost... 105 K on it, had since new, 16.8 MPG lifetime MPG< (105K/ 6250 gallons total used.) thats towing and empty.
THEORY>>>More power per weight ratio ..is better, with mileage towing or empty, engine has more power to move the same weight more effeciently with less fuel.
--history... my durango has 158K on it, was orignal order for car rental company, then sold in texas, then idaho. the tranny was shot when we got it, went thru the tranny and it was the nastiest, flilty one i have ever worked on (that was the inside of it) problely lack of maintenance...(got it replaced for $600... I Imagine the engine inside is the same way.
the power seems to be way down, wont pull hills very well at all. my Brother in law's honda pilot smoked it and mileage SUCKS!!! 8-10 mpg. its had a tuneup, new map, etc installed. dont seem to help. no codes showing.
now to the burning question. stock durango, stock weight, newer better engine w/ more HP for better mileage? should I have the 5.2 rebuilt? with a few enhacements to get around 325-350 HP? is this even possible within reason of $$?? maybe do a engine swap to newer gen engine for more power and mileage? or maybe swap in a v-10?? the v-10 is within a couple lbs of same weight, more displacement, and is 4" longer, + 100-150hp depending on year... found a couple v-10's with pcm's complete running under 75k miles for less than $2000...

Or get rid of it and buy a newer 7 pass import SUV?
final GOAL is 22+ mpg, nice HP, and towing ability, and reliablility. for a couple thousand $$$

not a hot rod..
any thoughts from the pro's and well experienced out there?
thanks...
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 08:47 AM
  #2  
shrpshtr325's Avatar
shrpshtr325
THE ULTI-MOD
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,797
Likes: 36
From: Union NJ
Default

i believe that to do the v10 (assuming you mean the viper v10) you will need to move the firewall back a little bit. in order to make it fit its a cool idea but a lot of work

i would not be getting rid of it if i had the connections that you do for parts/engines, i would swap in a 5.9 and call it a day. i will also add that the only easy engine swaps into your truck will be a 5.2 or a 5.9, the 4.7 has a different trans, different engine mounts and different wiring under the hood. That said you goal of 22+mpgs out of one of these bricks is very very lofty, id say 16 -18 is about where the ceiling sits, however if you go through with it and prove me wrong i would be very pleased as long as you documented what you did.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 08:53 AM
  #3  
ecred's Avatar
ecred
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

http://www.4wheeloffroad.com/project...e_2/index.html

Looks like a lot of work, but it turned out sweet.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 09:15 AM
  #4  
00 Durango's Avatar
00 Durango
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default 2000 durango fix, rebuild....

Thanks for the reply. I would not even consider the 4.7 for a swap, had one in the wifes 2000 grand cherokee limited, what a dog....test drove a newer gen durango with the 4.7 and felt that it could not get out of its own way driving around town.
I feel there is not enough gain in HP and tq to goto the 5.9. and my understanding is, they dont get any better mileage. (depending on driver habit) etc.
a newer Hemi swap would be great, but very expensive. im told that if i got one of the same year of v-10s as my durango, the PCM, wiring harness etc, is Identicle, difference is a different engine/ trans setup. not exactly plug and play so to speak but very close...
Id like to get a viper v-10, but they are $$$$$$$$ from what im finding...

the ram v-10s are a lot cheaper, sometimes with the trans behind it, with pcm's etc..change from manual clutch fan to slim electric should give me the room to clear the firewall. would have to really measure it out though.
anyone else thought of this or attempted it? i MIght look at getting a donor 2500 with a v-10 and get parts to swap that way.....would have everythign there...

(another reason im thinking about this is-- my grandfather has a stock 1998 (i think) ram 2500 with the v-10 and empty he gets about 20-21mpg on the hwy, and he DOES NOT drive like grandma.. he has the heavy foot...his truck has 186K on it, with part time RV-ing with a 30' 5th wheel. so it has not had an easy life. the truck will still "light up the tires. and run with the best of them" he has had no issues with the engine either....

Is it at all possible for the same range of $$$ 2000-3000 to rebuild and modify internally the 5.2 to get the same range of Hp as a v-10?? and still be driveable on the hwy/ street?
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 10:21 AM
  #5  
Old_School's Avatar
Old_School
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 6
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by ecred
http://www.4wheeloffroad.com/project...e_2/index.html

Looks like a lot of work, but it turned out sweet.
just curious what a dodge durago is???
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 10:23 AM
  #6  
ecred's Avatar
ecred
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Old_School
just curious what a dodge durago is???

Beats me, I didnt write the article...........
maybe it is the northern pronunciation
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 11:15 AM
  #7  
that_guy's Avatar
that_guy
Champion
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 44
From: Pittsburgh, PA or Columbia, SC
Default

Originally Posted by 00 Durango;[URL="tel:2800112"
2800112[/URL]]I read a lot on performance inhancements for the 00 druangos 5.2 4x4 SLT's

Are you sure its a 2000? The only 4x4 engines in 2000 were the 4.7 and the 5.9. The 5.2 was available in 2wd only in 2000.

Anyway the easiest way to get more power would be to tune up a 5.9 and swap it in. Swapping in a hemi would involve entirely different wiring (more similar to the 4.7 wiring) and the v10 would involve modifying the firewall like shrp said. That said almost anything's possible with enough money. 21mpg is probably out of reach unless you found some creative way to shut down a few cylinders when cruising like the newer hemis do. I really find it hard to believe that your friend got that mileage with a v10 2500, but like shrp said we'd love to proven wrong on the mileage part.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 03:16 AM
  #8  
Compactc9's Avatar
Compactc9
Veteran
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Default

I'd think a more flu efficient idea would be the Hemi swap, very good hp and with the newer technology its efficient for the power it makes. And you'd get the 545RFE, which is another thing that would make it a bit more efficient. Otherwise I'd be more inclined to a very well built up 5.9, possibly supercharged. When my 4.7 dies I'll end up just going with the newest HO 4.7.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 03:37 AM
  #9  
00 Durango's Avatar
00 Durango
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default Change of plans

The "boss" says no way on any changes, SELL IT!!!

so now its up for sale...

Oregon is exploring a "fuel tax" based on your mileage driven on regular paved roads, total miles driven, farm and ranch veciles used for that sole purpose is exempt. (so they say)

so on that thought, time for a lot more fuel effecient family rig....
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 08:54 AM
  #10  
shrpshtr325's Avatar
shrpshtr325
THE ULTI-MOD
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,797
Likes: 36
From: Union NJ
Default

or a new family home . . .
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:09 AM.