1st Gen Durango 1998 - 2003 Durango's

Lousy milage

Old Dec 19, 2003 | 11:47 PM
  #1  
Adam's Avatar
Adam
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: United States
Default Lousy milage



Hi,</P>


I just bought my first Dodge, it's a 1999 Durango,4x4 with a 5.9 with 70,000 miles. I really like the Durango but, do all Dodges use this much gas. I'm gettin 9 mpg<IMG src=smileys/smiley19.gif border="0">. What's the deal.....</P>


</P><edited><editID>Adam</editID><editDate>37975.955162037</editDate></edited>
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 09:03 PM
  #2  
ViperGTS's Avatar
ViperGTS
Banned
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,467
Likes: 0
From: There
Default Lousy milage

No, durangos should atleast be getting 15 mpg. I personally, if it were mine, would take it to a mechanic...
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2003 | 06:13 PM
  #3  
Custom R/T's Avatar
Custom R/T
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: United States
Default Lousy milage

Welcome to the 5.9 club. The cars dont get very good gas mileage. Are you going by what a computer read out is giving your or have you averaged the miles you get to a full tank. I know that my little computer thing tells me i get 12 miles to the gallon but when i run it from full to empty i get about 16 miles to the gallon by using the odometer. The worst is around town driving, any time the car is under 50 it is drinking gas.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2003 | 09:53 PM
  #4  
98 Black SLT's Avatar
98 Black SLT
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: United States
Default Lousy milage

I have a 1998 Durango SLT with the 5.2 and I only get between 12 and 13 mpg. Don't feel too bad about the 9 mpg.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2003 | 01:07 AM
  #5  
71RoadRunner's Avatar
71RoadRunner
Legend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,543
Likes: 2
From: United States
Default Lousy milage

Good God! That seems pretty bad to me. My Roadrunner averages 7.5 mpg, but thats because it's a mildly built 440 and not always keeping my foot out of it. <img border="0" src=smileys/smiley36.gif border="0"> No matter how heavy the Durango is it should be better than that. <img border="0" src=smileys/smiley5.gif border="0">
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2003 | 03:25 PM
  #6  
Custom R/T's Avatar
Custom R/T
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: United States
Default Lousy milage

You would be suprised and it is really hard to keep your foot off the gas especially in the city at all the stop lights. But i am pretty sure that if you calculate your mile per gallons instead of trusting the computers in the durangos it is about five miles to the gallon better.
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2003 | 06:56 AM
  #7  
71RoadRunner's Avatar
71RoadRunner
Legend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,543
Likes: 2
From: United States
Default Lousy milage

I would have to agree with that. <img border="0" src=smileys/smiley1.gif border="0">
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 03:58 PM
  #8  
difrey's Avatar
difrey
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: United States
Default Lousy milage

My 2003 5.2L gets horrible mileage in town, too. But, on the highwas it does much better. City driving I'm lucky to get 10-11 mpg, Hgy we get almost 25-30mpg.
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 05:25 AM
  #9  
71RoadRunner's Avatar
71RoadRunner
Legend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,543
Likes: 2
From: United States
Default Lousy milage

One thing that doesn't help is the PT Cruiser. Automakers only need to meet an average fuel economy based on the vehicle type. Since the PT Cruiser is classified as a truck it allows them to let the rest of the trucks fuel mileage go to hell and still keep within the fuel economy limitations.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2003 | 08:39 PM
  #10  
WicKeD1's Avatar
WicKeD1
Rookie
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: United States
Default Lousy milage

<FONT color=#cc33cc>urgh, i dont very good gas milage on my neon, but still you should get more then 9?</FONT>
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 AM.