just proved the neons capability
ORIGINAL: 12 volt
this post is useless
no one cares how juvenile andnegligent you can be
this post is useless
no one cares how juvenile andnegligent you can be
Whats so bad about racing in 35mph zone that is pretty much dead in the early morning? speeds didn't go past 60mph and there was no traffic other than us 2 and it was pretty clear after I got into my powerband I was pulling car lengths every 2 seconds andgoing to smoke him even worse so I shut it down at like 50mph on a 4 lane city/highwayroad, Its not like I was inFast and the Furious where I'm putting the Nitrous on at 100mph on city streets and going for broke, I had about a quarter mile before there was any roads that somebody can pull out in front of us, seeing it was a semi highway there were very few cross roads or drivewayturnoffs for at least a quarter mile. Pretty much the race was from 0-50mph in a 35 zone. +15miles over
.
ORIGINAL: estneon
i like this post it proves people don't now anything about chevy. the only realy fast chevy is the corvette...theres more but their not worth talking about. my faverite thing about chevy was they got the viper banned from racing agaist their corvette on some track racing thing...because it was faster
...i thought that was the point[8D]
i like this post it proves people don't now anything about chevy. the only realy fast chevy is the corvette...theres more but their not worth talking about. my faverite thing about chevy was they got the viper banned from racing agaist their corvette on some track racing thing...because it was faster
...i thought that was the point[8D]
So, what was Chevy doing in that same time??? Let's see there..... Lumina Z34, Monte Carlo SS, Impala SS, Camaro SS/Z28, Caprice, Corvette......all Chevy built cars... and these are cars that are from the late 80's until now.....all that would outperform most of what Dodge has done in the same amount of time.
To say the Corvette is the only fast Chevy islike me saying the only fast Dodge is the Viper....
As to the whole Neon vs. S-10....you beat a slow P.O.S. that couldnt get out of its own way let alone the Neon. The 4.3L V6 was underpowered even in its prime (170-200hp/220-250ftlbs of torque, depending on the year) Honestly, it's nothing to brag about.
i have a 95 blazer vortec 4.3 H.O. that is throttle body injected, as appose to later 4.3s that are center port injected. and a dohc neon. the neon is faster but its a car. the blazer has 260 lb ft of torque for pulling not for acceleration. why would someone gauge their car against something with a frame twice as heavy? uphill the blazer would womp the neon. on the level though the neon would pull away. plus blazers are speed limited to 95ish. mph.
hey hey. i love my 4.3 vortec blazer with a 5 spd. its not fast but it impressed the hell outa me. i ran a 15.7 at 88mph dead stock and that was spinning till the end of 2nd gear. IMO people just underestimate anything they havent owned themselves. on the other hand .... it will be fast when i finish getting the turbo parts for it...... turbo blazer
and its not hard at all to do either
this aint my website but another persons who did a turbo blazer http://02vortec.tripod.com/index.html
and its not hard at all to do eitherthis aint my website but another persons who did a turbo blazer http://02vortec.tripod.com/index.html
1st of all im not bragging at all.im just sayin how people where i live are givin me more credit now. and he just proved my point. ^^^ if a stock 4.3 vortec 5 speed runs 15.7 stock then that would put up a hell of a race against a pretty much stock neon. mine. thats about whatstock DOHC 5 spd neons do.so therefore you cant say that theres absolutely no doubt that i would beat him.
ORIGINAL: justinsanders
1st of all im not bragging at all.im just sayin how people where i live are givin me more credit now. and he just proved my point. ^^^ if a stock 4.3 vortec 5 speed runs 15.7 stock then that would put up a hell of a race against a pretty much stock neon. mine. thats about whatstock DOHC 5 spd neons do.so therefore you cant say that theres absolutely no doubt that i would beat him.
1st of all im not bragging at all.im just sayin how people where i live are givin me more credit now. and he just proved my point. ^^^ if a stock 4.3 vortec 5 speed runs 15.7 stock then that would put up a hell of a race against a pretty much stock neon. mine. thats about whatstock DOHC 5 spd neons do.so therefore you cant say that theres absolutely no doubt that i would beat him.
Also, dont be mislead by what someone ran at a track. Conditions are different all across this country.
well mines a 2000 2dr 2wd 5spd/ rated at 190 hp at 4400 rpm and 250 torque at 2800. has 3.42 gears and a factory lsd and weighs around 45-4600 pounds. i know track times and conditions are different all around too. i dont think all the stock 4.3 vortecs run 15's though because i got into a discussion on a blazer forum and nobody there beleived that i ran that time untill i scanned the slip for them. most of them only claimed to have run mid 16's. if i had some way to get traction and still launch good i woulda ran a spot better. but tires and a slippery 60ft made it wat it was. also hp and torgue dont mean you will win. like devilregect said you gota go with wieght, body, driver and all kinds of things. i can totally smoke my friends v6 mustang wich is rated at more hp than my blazer, i can beat my frineds 300zx n/a wich i think is rated at like 210hp. all has to do with conditions. o and i ran those times with a broken motor mount( driver side) and a failing passenger side mount..... wich i am now on the 3rd set of mounts
ok i c now. but the only reason y i won is cuz i jumped off the line. im a good driver with 5 speeds but i wasn't really pulling him a whole lot. maybe a little




