Turbo 2.0L or naturally aspirated 2.4L???
ORIGINAL: mulletman11
95to96 was saying the block for the 2.4 is lighter than the oem engine i believe?
and ur gonna have a hard time getting it down to 1700 lbs my man, evan with everything guttted
ur gonna need that fake lass **** and carbon fier everything
use big cams and shorty headers for low rpm gains
95to96 was saying the block for the 2.4 is lighter than the oem engine i believe?
and ur gonna have a hard time getting it down to 1700 lbs my man, evan with everything guttted
ur gonna need that fake lass **** and carbon fier everything
use big cams and shorty headers for low rpm gains
i dont know how to read a dyno? your saying this cause u know my capabilitys of looking at a line on a paper?
ok, didnt know you knew me that well
and post whoring?
who just posted 3 messages, but didnt actually say anything?
you jack off
ok, didnt know you knew me that well
and post whoring?
who just posted 3 messages, but didnt actually say anything?
you jack off
ORIGINAL: mulletman11
i dont know how to read a dyno your saying this cause u know my capabilitys of looking at a line on a paper?
i dont know how to read a dyno your saying this cause u know my capabilitys of looking at a line on a paper?
me giving you my dyno sheet to read would be like me giving my dog the news paper to read and comprehend.
As for the guy who wants to go turbo or na 2.4, I would say turbo the 2.4 and have some fun.
ORIGINAL: JackMehoffer69
Exactly.
me giving you my dyno sheet to read would be like me giving my dog the news paper to read and comprehend.
As for the guy who wants to go turbo or na 2.4, I would say turbo the 2.4 and have some fun.
ORIGINAL: mulletman11
i dont know how to read a dyno your saying this cause u know my capabilitys of looking at a line on a paper?
i dont know how to read a dyno your saying this cause u know my capabilitys of looking at a line on a paper?
me giving you my dyno sheet to read would be like me giving my dog the news paper to read and comprehend.
As for the guy who wants to go turbo or na 2.4, I would say turbo the 2.4 and have some fun.
thats his dilemma...its one or the other...because of the racing rules and so on...it can be up to a 2.28L motor..unelss its a n/a which can be up to a 3.2...and do you know of a 4 banger thats a 3.2 that will fit in a neon with out major work?
as for the original problem you should stick with the 2.0/2.2 you basically explained it yourself in the beginning...but as far as running a 10.5:1 compression im not to sure on that...i mean i dont see why not but...double check with spud or 95to96...also pending on the turbo you get...i will try and find a list of spool times for different turbos...on a 2.0/2.2...i could have sworn somebody has posted it before
jack off i was being sacrastic, i didnt know you knew me well enough to judge wether or not i can read a dyno
and seeing as i can, you an idiot
as for a dog reading a news paper, that makes just about as much sense as you with 300 hp
and seeing as i can, you an idiot
as for a dog reading a news paper, that makes just about as much sense as you with 300 hp
ORIGINAL: 95to96transplantneon
why not go 2.4 and throw a lettered 2.0 valve cover on there no one will be the wiser...
why not go 2.4 and throw a lettered 2.0 valve cover on there no one will be the wiser...
ORIGINAL: mulletman11
jack off i was being sacrastic, i didnt know you knew me well enough to judge wether or not i can read a dyno
and seeing as i can, you an idiot
as for a dog reading a news paper, that makes just about as much sense as you with 300 hp
jack off i was being sacrastic, i didnt know you knew me well enough to judge wether or not i can read a dyno
and seeing as i can, you an idiot
as for a dog reading a news paper, that makes just about as much sense as you with 300 hp



