1st Gen Neon 1995 through 1999 Neons

Turbo 2.0L or naturally aspirated 2.4L???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 11:35 PM
  #21  
mulletman11's Avatar
mulletman11
All Star
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Turbo 2.0L or naturally aspirated 2.4L???

ifs it inly 275 at crank theres nwih thats ist near 300 whp

and this is w a stg 2 hahn, which is not wat he has
 
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 01:55 AM
  #22  
JackMehoffer69's Avatar
JackMehoffer69
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Kahzakstan
Default RE: Turbo 2.0L or naturally aspirated 2.4L???

ORIGINAL: mulletman11

ifs it inly 275 at crank theres nwih thats ist near 300 whp

and this is w a stg 2 hahn, which is not wat he has
i'm talking 300hp at the crank not at the wheels and thats just my guess not in stone, i wouldn't be suprised to see 320hp.

Hahn does not make turbos Mulletman Mitsubishi and Garrett do and many more. only thing hahn actually makes for turbos is the manifold and my manifold is a tubular log style similar to hahnsthat i welded together from a ebay flange kit.

the Garrett turbo i have is the same one off of a 88turbo 1 Charger. various incarnations of those 2.2's used the same Garrett turbo to push 400hp out of a 2.2 these turbos have enough power to roast most moderatly built engines and can compete with Hahn on every level for max output.

when i upgrade my fuel system i willtry 25psi, i've got a bullitproof bottum end so i don't see a reason why i shouldn't be able to push 300hp without trying very hard.

the only difference between stage 1 and 2 of hahn is the intercooler and possibly biggerinjectors and a bump up to 8psi from 7psithats it from what i remember.

if you live any where near wisconsin i invite you for a ride, i'm also heading to neons08 if you are coming you can come for a ride and feel what built dohc with a nice 20 year old garret turbo can do, slash is going as well i'm surehe will give you a ride too.
 
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 12:10 PM
  #23  
12 volt's Avatar
12 volt
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
From: roswell New Mexico
Default RE: Turbo 2.0L or naturally aspirated 2.4L???

ORIGINAL: JackMehoffer69

ORIGINAL: mulletman11

ifs it inly 275 at crank theres nwih thats ist near 300 whp

and this is w a stg 2 hahn, which is not wat he has
i'm talking 300hp at the crank not at the wheels and thats just my guess not in stone, i wouldn't be suprised to see 320hp.

Hahn does not make turbos Mulletman Mitsubishi and Garrett do and many more. only thing hahn actually makes for turbos is the manifold and my manifold is a tubular log style similar to hahnsthat i welded together from a ebay flange kit.

the Garrett turbo i have is the same one off of a 88turbo 1 Charger. various incarnations of those 2.2's used the same Garrett turbo to push 400hp out of a 2.2 these turbos have enough power to roast most moderatly built engines and can compete with Hahn on every level for max output.

when i upgrade my fuel system i willtry 25psi, i've got a bullitproof bottum end so i don't see a reason why i shouldn't be able to push 300hp without trying very hard.

the only difference between stage 1 and 2 of hahn is the intercooler and possibly biggerinjectors and a bump up to 8psi from 7psithats it from what i remember.

if you live any where near wisconsin i invite you for a ride, i'm also heading to neons08 if you are coming you can come for a ride and feel what built dohc with a nice 20 year old garret turbo can do, slash is going as well i'm surehe will give you a ride too.
pics please!
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2008 | 12:18 AM
  #24  
mulletman11's Avatar
mulletman11
All Star
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Turbo 2.0L or naturally aspirated 2.4L???

watver man, not gonna rgue about it anymore
yea im goin to neon2k8
see u and slash there
ill take pics and well see if it really has anywhere near 300hp
ill be there jacko
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:07 PM.