5 speed or auto
#51
02-25-2005, 01:29 PM
#52
03-13-2005, 11:06 PM
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 5 speed or auto
if you shift fast enough the r's really dont drop....and since the 5-speeds gears are a closer ratio than a 4 speed and ESPECIALLY the 3 speed....sounds like a sticks better for a turbo....plus in a stick you control the engine r's for off line take off also....so let me think....shift fast...closer ratio...more power to the ground....more fun to drive...faster...better gas mileage and its standard equipment so i payed 600 dollars less....and got all these benefits...theres your answer...theres no debate
#53
03-15-2005, 08:51 PM
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 4,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#54
03-16-2005, 02:34 AM
RE: 5 speed or auto
ORIGINAL: lonasindi
eh... didn't know that.
still illustrates my point.
regardless.... some mod really oughta lock this thread, it's been said a few times now:
It's all opinion. no system is better than another 100% of the time. arguments are pointless.
ORIGINAL: RT_Driver
It's called a sequential transmission. It's not an auto, and it's not a stick. A sequential doesn't use torque converters or clutches. From what I've read about them they use a dog box. And the cost for one of them is around the price a SRT-4.
ORIGINAL: lonasindi
look at high end cars, like the me-412. it had a 'manually shifted automatic transmission'. you know what that means?
look at high end cars, like the me-412. it had a 'manually shifted automatic transmission'. you know what that means?
eh... didn't know that.
still illustrates my point.
regardless.... some mod really oughta lock this thread, it's been said a few times now:
It's all opinion. no system is better than another 100% of the time. arguments are pointless.
