2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

2000 Dakota 3.9?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-19-2007, 02:33 AM
Gunslinger's Avatar
Gunslinger
Gunslinger is offline
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2000 Dakota 3.9?

So...I'm new here. I don't drive a Dodge right now. I don't drive anything. I recently totaled my '01 blazer. I slid off the road into some guy wires and they threw me into a telephone pole. I've been a fan of Dodge's since I can remember having a preference towards trucks. Since I totaled my Blazer, I've been looking for a car/truck. My grandpa told me to look at Dakotas. I know they are reliable trucks (my dad has an 89 with close to 200k on it and it still runs good, even though its super slow..) and I like the look of the second gens. I found one that I like the looks of but I'm wondering about the power its putting out. I know the 3.9l doesn't produce spectacular numbers or anything, but neither did my Blazer. My Blazer was a 4x4 4.3 producing about 195 hp and 250 ft-lbs. From what I've read, the 3.9 magnum in the 2000's put out 175 hp and 235 ft-lbs. The dak I was looking at was 2wd. So I'm curious as to how the low end/high end would compare to my Blazer. Both are auto (even though I want a straight stick). In my head, it seems like the dak would perform just as well as the blazer since the 4x4 in the blazer would have made it heavy. I don't know a whole lot about the weight of daks or anything. The only one I've ever driven is my dads...and his only puts out like 125 hp. It won't accelerate up a hill. I'm still looking, so its not like this one dak is a sure thing. I might find one with a 4.7 (we have a grand cherokee with a 4.7...auto w/overdrive...I love driving that thing). Other than that, sorry for the long winded post.
 
  #2  
Old 10-19-2007, 01:04 PM
varsis's Avatar
varsis
varsis is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2000 Dakota 3.9?

v8 is the way to go. Check this topic out: https://dodgeforum.com/m_1009112/tm.htm

Dakota's are fairly good. I must have gotten a bad one mine is falling apart. Tranny gone, wheel bearing just went. Seems nothing but problems for me... tranny way kind of my fault sunk, it water in there.
 
  #3  
Old 10-19-2007, 03:01 PM
Nicegy525's Avatar
Nicegy525
Nicegy525 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2000 Dakota 3.9?

3.9L is good for around town stuff. A 2wd will be lighter as well. I had a '95 blazer and it definitely had more power than my 3.9L. But a V8 gets about as good gas mileage as the 3.9 and has tons more power. I would not buy a 4 door dakota with the 3.9L motor.
 
  #4  
Old 10-19-2007, 06:50 PM
imnothot02's Avatar
imnothot02
imnothot02 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2000 Dakota 3.9?

what are you going to be doing w. the truck...
 
  #5  
Old 10-20-2007, 12:14 AM
skeeter0288's Avatar
skeeter0288
skeeter0288 is offline
Professional
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2000 Dakota 3.9?

i had a 1999 3.9 ext.cab auto=i now have a 2004 3.7 regular cab 5 speed manual.this one will run circles around the 3.9 and is better on fuel.there seemed to be several problems with converters and fuel pumps on the 3.9 as well.as far as i know,there aren't any on the 3.7.
 
  #6  
Old 10-20-2007, 01:31 AM
Gunslinger's Avatar
Gunslinger
Gunslinger is offline
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2000 Dakota 3.9?

I'm basically only going to be driving back and forth to work, but I like the power. I've had to drive my dads dak to work a few times. It has the older non-magnum 3.9 and it might as well be an i4. It takes it a mile to get from 75 to 85, no exageration. I had really started to like my blazer, which is why I was so sad to see it go. I'd love to find a 4.7 dak. My blazer would run circles around any honda around here and I know from experience that a 4.7 wiould run circles around my blazer. I raced my dad in our 4.7 grand cherokee and he killed me. If anyone knows of any 4.7s for sale, let me know through pm, please?

But yeah, I figured I'd be dissatisfied with the 3.9. If it comes down to it, and I have no choice, I'll go with a 3.9. But I'm not going with the first thing that pops up so I'll keep my eyes open.
 
  #7  
Old 10-20-2007, 03:45 AM
5 speed's Avatar
5 speed
5 speed is offline
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: 2000 Dakota 3.9?

a 3.9 5 speed would be quick, but go with a v8 truck if you like having fun behind the wheel
 
  #8  
Old 10-28-2007, 08:57 PM
bbwrench's Avatar
bbwrench
bbwrench is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2000 Dakota 3.9?

In june I bought an 02 Dak ex cab 4X4 3.9 5-speed bone stock besides bigger tires. I knew the 3.9 was a dog but with a 5-speed what a difference. Ive hauled 2800 lbs of lumber in the bed, it sagged pretty good but hauled it without a problem. I was so impressed I stopped at the scales & had it weighed. So far I like it & have had no problems.
 



Quick Reply: 2000 Dakota 3.9?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 AM.