Trans Q + power Q
well of course i'm wanting to snag what i can. And $75 for a TB for 25 HP and 30 ft-lb or something like that is better than $200+ for a superchips for 15 HP and 25 ft-lbs. ect.
i was speaking, top end terms. somebod said it doesnt do squat till 3K...and the power band is really narrow, 2600 to 3400.

http://www.allpar.com/images/engines/power-39.gif
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/39.html

http://www.allpar.com/images/engines/power-39.gif
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/39.html
Last edited by magnethead; Feb 6, 2009 at 09:05 PM.
ah ok... yeah i believe the superchips will give you that much power all the way through the rev range (which might be a better buy afterall)...
im just waiting till the end of the summer when i get a supercharger
im just waiting till the end of the summer when i get a supercharger
you WILL need the programmer then!
but you also have the mighty mouse with a stick. So you have more potential than my squeeker with a slushbox. :P
haha
http://www.hughesengines.com/TechArt...es03012004.php
For example when we modify the stock throttle body for the V8 the percentage of flow increase is 15%, but for the V6 (p/n 5500) the improvement is 43%.
43% is a heck of alot for a V6! especially at the top end.
http://www.hughesengines.com/TechArt...es03012004.php
For example when we modify the stock throttle body for the V8 the percentage of flow increase is 15%, but for the V6 (p/n 5500) the improvement is 43%.
43% is a heck of alot for a V6! especially at the top end.
allpar says the 3.9 was more of an cheap to produce economy motor. so of course it had alot of contraints. but apparently the manifold limites the effectiveness of a bigger TB. IDK what bore the manifold is though.






