Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:
Browse all: Fuel System
- Dodge Ram 2nd Gen Why Am I Getting Poor MPG
Guide to diagnost and recommended solutions.
Browse all: Fuel System
Poor Gas mileage & Loss of Power "Solved"
#12
Ron,
It's not about the sensor going bad, it's about the sensor not reading correctly anymore. Age + carbon build up makes the sensor inaccurate.
In the 1st Gen durango forum, another member tried the map sensor, he replied that it greatly improved his throttle response and more power and will check the final mileage after the first tank. He's happy with the new map sensor.
It's not about the sensor going bad, it's about the sensor not reading correctly anymore. Age + carbon build up makes the sensor inaccurate.
In the 1st Gen durango forum, another member tried the map sensor, he replied that it greatly improved his throttle response and more power and will check the final mileage after the first tank. He's happy with the new map sensor.
#13
This gets interesting now, I've had my 2004 QC 4.7 4wd for two years now and have thought the mileage sucked. The best I got was 17 mpg driving like a little old lady on a 400 mile trip, and around town its 12 if I'm lucky. Truck runs just fine and even installed a kn filter and flowmaster 70, which didn't change anything. Is there a way to test it ? The truck has 30k on it, like to improve it a little before I head out west for vacation.
Thanks Ron
Thanks Ron
#14
i just tested the sensor on my 3.9 v6, here are my findings..
5.14 volts from the pcm to the sensor, thats within range so its good
sensor reads 1.38 volts with the engine not running
sensor with engine running at idle is the same, supposed to be at least 1.5 volts
sensor with engine at wide open throttle is 1.7 volts.. supposed to be between 4-5 volts... will be ordering a new map sensor.. thanks for the insight, even us experienced guys learn new things.
5.14 volts from the pcm to the sensor, thats within range so its good
sensor reads 1.38 volts with the engine not running
sensor with engine running at idle is the same, supposed to be at least 1.5 volts
sensor with engine at wide open throttle is 1.7 volts.. supposed to be between 4-5 volts... will be ordering a new map sensor.. thanks for the insight, even us experienced guys learn new things.
Last edited by f0x672; 05-28-2009 at 06:56 PM.
#15
i just tested the sensor on my 3.9 v6, here are my findings..
5.14 volts from the pcm to the sensor, thats within range so its good
sensor reads 1.38 volts with the engine not running, about .12 volts under what it should be.
sensor with engine running at idle is the same
sensor with engine at idle open throttle is 1.7 volts.. supposed to be between 4-5 volts... will be ordering a new map sensor.. thanks for the insight, even us experienced guys learn new things.
5.14 volts from the pcm to the sensor, thats within range so its good
sensor reads 1.38 volts with the engine not running, about .12 volts under what it should be.
sensor with engine running at idle is the same
sensor with engine at idle open throttle is 1.7 volts.. supposed to be between 4-5 volts... will be ordering a new map sensor.. thanks for the insight, even us experienced guys learn new things.
#17
#18
i just tested the sensor on my 3.9 v6, here are my findings..
5.14 volts from the pcm to the sensor, thats within range so its good
sensor reads 1.38 volts with the engine not running, about .12 volts under what it should be.
sensor with engine running at idle is the same
sensor with engine at idle open throttle is 1.7 volts.. supposed to be between 4-5 volts... will be ordering a new map sensor.. thanks for the insight, even us experienced guys learn new things.
5.14 volts from the pcm to the sensor, thats within range so its good
sensor reads 1.38 volts with the engine not running, about .12 volts under what it should be.
sensor with engine running at idle is the same
sensor with engine at idle open throttle is 1.7 volts.. supposed to be between 4-5 volts... will be ordering a new map sensor.. thanks for the insight, even us experienced guys learn new things.
#19
edited my first post, and no codes what so ever, i un plugged the sensor to test for the 5 volts, turned the ignition to run, without the engine running. didnt throw a code. started it up, threw a code for high resistance, something like that, didnt grab the code. cleared it (thanks superchips for this option). and proceeded testing it. otherwise no codes from daily use, nada.
#20
Although I don't have a 2nd gen, since we're on the topic of MAP sensors, I went out and tested mine this evening. It read fine with the motor off, but with the motor idling, it was at ~1.12V. When I kicked it up to WOT, it peaked at ~4.35V, and when it was dropping back to idle, it was reading ~0.15V (although it drops fast, so that was a hard one to check). These aren't horrible readings, but they are at the very low side of the accepted range. What do you guys think, replace it or leave it?
I should also mention, the reason I checked it in the first place is cause my truck has a hard time coming back down to idle when I depress the clutch. It will try to stall and then "catch" itself. I have already replaced the IAC. It's been like this ever since I did the auto to manual transmission swap.
I should also mention, the reason I checked it in the first place is cause my truck has a hard time coming back down to idle when I depress the clutch. It will try to stall and then "catch" itself. I have already replaced the IAC. It's been like this ever since I did the auto to manual transmission swap.
Last edited by 95_318SLT; 05-28-2009 at 08:59 PM.