2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

What is the thinnest tires that could fit stock SXT 16 inch (7inch width) rims

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 02:39 AM
  #1  
04Dakota220000miles's Avatar
04Dakota220000miles
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Default What is the thinnest tires that could fit stock SXT 16 inch (7inch width) rims

I know i can do at least 235/70/16

Is it possible to go thinner?

Stock is 245/70/16

Does a thinner tire give more traction?
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 03:52 AM
  #2  
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
Legend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,058
Likes: 184
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

thinner tire = higher contact pressure (more weight per contact patch surface area), lower flotation (water can escape out from under the tire easier)

wider tire = lower contact pressure (less weight per contact patch surface area), higher flotation (water can become trapped under the centerline of the tire if the tread isn't designed right)

By classic definition, a wider tire gives more grip in the dry.

The graph of general traction (dry/wet/ice/snow/etc) versus tire width is a parabola. But the actual formula, I don't know of. Basically, I think every dakota here on this website has 255's or 265's, and a few have 275's I think.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 10:55 AM
  #3  
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

Why would you want such a "thin" or narrow tire?
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 02:42 PM
  #4  
batman13's Avatar
batman13
Grand Champion
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,597
Likes: 0
From: N.Ridgeville, OH
Default

i've got 235/60s (9.5" treadwidth 26" tall) on an 8 inch wide wheel

thin tires rarely give more traction, in thick mud they will dig down to the firm ground under the muck,
in snow they do the same
and they dont hydroplane as much. sure,

but they will have much less traction driving on dry ground, so unless all of your driving is in bad conditions id stay with the 235s
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 04:18 PM
  #5  
Loud Pedal's Avatar
Loud Pedal
The Total Package
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Default

for my 20s and when i lower it i HAVE to settle for a 265/30r20 to accomidate the 2 inch drop up front and a 20 inch rim
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2009 | 01:18 AM
  #6  
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
Legend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,058
Likes: 184
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

Originally Posted by batman13
i've got 235/60s (9.5" treadwidth 26" tall) on an 8 inch wide wheel

thin tires rarely give more traction, in thick mud they will dig down to the firm ground under the muck,
in snow they do the same
and they dont hydroplane as much. sure,

but they will have much less traction driving on dry ground, so unless all of your driving is in bad conditions id stay with the 235s
basically, what I said, without all the wording and technicalities.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2009 | 04:23 PM
  #7  
04Dakota220000miles's Avatar
04Dakota220000miles
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Default

I saw the Firestone Winterforce makes a 225/75/16.
Load Range XL.

I also looked into 215/85/16 : but I am a little concerned about the harder ride and the wear that will do to my truck.
[b/c they are Heavy Duty Tires]

My Intentions:
Better Fuel Economy (thinner tire)
Better Traction: 2WD
I do not want to cause stress to my powertrain.

Considering
Firestone Winterforce
Destination LE or AT

Something with a bit of an aggressive tread and some siping...I don't want to be screwed in the snow with a 2WD...
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 PM.