2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

Check out this Dakota

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-11-2010 | 06:41 PM
dirtbiker's Avatar
dirtbiker
Thread Starter
|
Captain
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Default Check out this Dakota

I just searched for "lifted dakota" and found this. Check out the suspension on this thing (probably not worth it since it's a 2WD), but still it's cool.
http://www.davisautosales.com/window...FL26X7XS201569
 
  #2  
Old 12-11-2010 | 06:54 PM
thunder98110's Avatar
thunder98110
Champion
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,084
Likes: 6
From: DC
Default

wtf. does it really need that massive spoiler? and its the 3.9? god damn that thing must be slow.
 
  #3  
Old 12-11-2010 | 07:38 PM
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

Originally Posted by thunder98110
wtf. does it really need that massive spoiler? and its the 3.9? god damn that thing must be slow.
Yeah well you wouldn't drive it on the road so it's probably not that big of a deal as long as it was geared correctly. And yeah, that spoiler is pretty lame.
 
  #4  
Old 12-11-2010 | 08:00 PM
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
Legend
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,020
Likes: 171
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

Truth in labeling. It claims 4x2 but sure looks like there's a transfercase. The driveshaft angles are downright scary though....

TIRES AND WHEELS NOT INCLUDED AT THIS PRICE, 8 LUG AXLES, HUGE LEAF SPRING SUSPENSION, LOW MILEAGE LOTS OF POSSIBILITIES AND WE CAN PUT TOGETHER SEVERAL TIRE AND WHEEL CHOICES FOR YOU. TRUCK WILL CLEAR UP TO 54 BOGGERS PHOTOS SHOW 49 IROKS ON VEHICLE....THIS TRUCK IS NOT STREET LEGAL, IS BASICALLY A PILE OF PARTS STUCK TOGETHER AS A ATTEMPT AT A PROJECT.
 
  #5  
Old 12-11-2010 | 09:54 PM
dirtbiker's Avatar
dirtbiker
Thread Starter
|
Captain
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Default

Yeah that spoiler is stupid. I just thought it was kind of crazy to see a Dakota this high, but if I were going to take the time to do something like that, I'd make sure it was a V8 and 4x4 (I didn't see a 4x4 shifter in the cab, this year was before the electronic ones)
 
  #6  
Old 12-11-2010 | 11:36 PM
Pwall's Avatar
Pwall
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: south florida
Default

you can see the drive shaft and the front and rear axles
 
  #7  
Old 12-12-2010 | 12:06 AM
dirtbiker's Avatar
dirtbiker
Thread Starter
|
Captain
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Default

Yeah I see that now... haha
 
  #8  
Old 12-12-2010 | 12:28 PM
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

Yeah it was probably originally a 4x2. If you're going to build a truck like this you would end up swapping out the entire front end anyway so it makes sense to start with a 4x2. And you can obviously see a front axle and diff. Plus it says it has dana 60s.
 
  #9  
Old 12-12-2010 | 03:51 PM
00dakSport's Avatar
00dakSport
All Star
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
From: long island, NY
Default

haha can you still call that a dakota? i wouldn't take it anywhere offroad. now this one i would.

DSCN0835.jpg
 
  #10  
Old 12-12-2010 | 04:00 PM
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 2
From: Battle Ground WA
Default

Garbage.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:20 AM.