2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

This is what more guys use an F-150 for..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 11:13 AM
  #11  
jondakotaguy's Avatar
jondakotaguy
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 10
From: Texas
Default

My dad has a 5.4 not as torquey (LOL) as I remember my old Carb 5.0's...
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 11:16 AM
  #12  
jondakotaguy's Avatar
jondakotaguy
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 10
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by magnethead
And the fact that it's a small block Chrysler, said parts are easy/cheap to get if you look in the right places.
Except they dont have alot of options for aftermarket intake's not like some other engines.. Only have like 1 option for the 318.. re-branded edlebrok one is the same price.. so not really anything there.. but different name on it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 06:18 PM
  #13  
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

Originally Posted by dodgeramguy85
Anything is gonna be faster with a turbo on it. My pap has a 07 f150 with the 5.4 in it and its a turd. Put 3k behind it and its horrible. As far as hemis go our 07 1500 isnt that impressive either. Im pretty sure my dakota could of spanked it no problem. Its got great bottom end but after about 60mph they dont climb too fast. My inline 6 with 6k on the back would kill a eco boost.
I would hope so, you have a turbo'd 6.7L vs a turbo'd 3.5...
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 06:35 PM
  #14  
dodgeramguy85's Avatar
dodgeramguy85
Grand Champion
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 7
From: Houtzdale,PA
Default

Originally Posted by bpark8824
I would hope so, you have a turbo'd 6.7L vs a turbo'd 3.5...
Nope only a 5.9 those 6.7s have too much emissions crap for me. That would be a total of 8k heavier then the eco boost.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 07:08 PM
  #15  
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

Originally Posted by dodgeramguy85
Nope only a 5.9 those 6.7s have too much emissions crap for me. That would be a total of 8k heavier then the eco boost.
Oops sorry, still, 1.8L more, which is an entire 4 banger. There is no way its 8000 lbs heavier... An F-150 weighs right around 5000 lbs, you're telling me a 2500 weighs 13,000 lbs? You're out of your mind man.
 

Last edited by bpark8824; Nov 19, 2012 at 07:15 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 08:03 PM
  #16  
dodgeramguy85's Avatar
dodgeramguy85
Grand Champion
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 7
From: Houtzdale,PA
Default

Originally Posted by bpark8824
Oops sorry, still, 1.8L more, which is an entire 4 banger. There is no way its 8000 lbs heavier... An F-150 weighs right around 5000 lbs, you're telling me a 2500 weighs 13,000 lbs? You're out of your mind man.
No in my earlier post I said with 6k behind me. Im about 7,500lb Hell my engine alone weighs 1,000 lb
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 08:24 PM
  #17  
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

Originally Posted by dodgeramguy85
No in my earlier post I said with 6k behind me. Im about 7,500lb Hell my engine alone weighs 1,000 lb
Oh, my bad. I thought you were saying curb weight was 8000 more, I thought you were on something.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 08:48 PM
  #18  
dodgeramguy85's Avatar
dodgeramguy85
Grand Champion
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 7
From: Houtzdale,PA
Default

Originally Posted by bpark8824
Oh, my bad. I thought you were saying curb weight was 8000 more, I thought you were on something.
Maybe if I had a 5500 cab and chassis with a steel dump bed on it on a ton of dirt in it haha
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 08:50 PM
  #19  
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

Lol, yeah maybe then... How many miles does you Ram have? Any issues yet? A co-worker of mine had an 05 6.7 2500 and had a TON of problems. Not motor related, but electrical and front end issues. Sometimes it would go into 4wd on it's own....
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 09:55 PM
  #20  
jondakotaguy's Avatar
jondakotaguy
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 10
From: Texas
Default

I think I'mma take the beast out one day and see what she'll do against the Ford. He's got about 100-125HP on me.. but he's also got an extra what 3K of weight. I'm 4x4 and geared different.. for better lower end. I think i could hang with him lol
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:38 PM.