2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

Rear end upgrades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 02-07-2013, 01:23 AM
MoparMan1991's Avatar
MoparMan1991
MoparMan1991 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Barksdale AFB, LA
Posts: 2,213
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If you have 3.55s, bumping to a 3.92 isn't really that much gain for the cost. You'd be better off going to a 4.10. 4.56s are often used for trucks with 35" tires or a little bigger.
 
  #12  
Old 02-07-2013, 01:53 AM
dodgeramguy85's Avatar
dodgeramguy85
dodgeramguy85 is offline
Grand Champion
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houtzdale,PA
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MoparMan1991
If you have 3.55s, bumping to a 3.92 isn't really that much gain for the cost. You'd be better off going to a 4.10. 4.56s are often used for trucks with 35" tires or a little bigger.
Depends how much highway driving he does. I have 4.10's and absolutely HATE them! I wish I had 3.55's
 
  #13  
Old 02-07-2013, 02:09 AM
Wes Garrett's Avatar
Wes Garrett
Wes Garrett is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Shirey, MA
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i got the 8.25 rear end, at 3.92, i want a better ratio for towing/hauling.. any ideas, i was thinking 4.56
 
  #14  
Old 02-07-2013, 08:53 AM
98DAKAZ's Avatar
98DAKAZ
98DAKAZ is offline
Champion
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 4,888
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

It all depends on what you use the truck for city driving or hauling and also on what gas mileage you want or if you can get good gas mileage considering how you use the truck.

No simple answer and not cheap to fix if you get it wrong.

I have the 3.55 with the 2.5 engine geared for gas economy and it works out great most of the time but it would be nice to have a little more guts/power to it and would like to change just a small amount to a 3.72 or 3.92 the 3.92 would be the best for more power but the 3.72 could be the best answer for both a small power boost and keep my good gas mileage

I do also have taller tires than the stock tires not much taller but enough to bog down my engine at times
 

Last edited by 98DAKAZ; 02-07-2013 at 08:57 AM.
  #15  
Old 02-07-2013, 11:56 AM
DakinUK's Avatar
DakinUK
DakinUK is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I personally think going up (or down) one step in ratio isn't worth the cost, especially if you've got 4WD. I went from 3.55 to 4.10 on my V8 AWD and I'm so glad I didn't go for the 3.92. The difference between 3.55 and 3.92 is 10% where as 3.55 to 4.10 is 15%.

At 70mph, the engine went from 2100rpm to 2400rpm with the new gears. I didn't think that it would make much of a difference to the highway use but it was quite noticable. Luckerly, my truck has the 45RFE tranny which I decided to try reprogram by using a 545RFE controller off a 05 Grand Cherokee. Despite throwing a code about some "incompatibility issue" and putting all the PNR21 lights on at once, it works! I gained an extra overdrive gear that drops the RPM back down to same RPM it used to run with the old gears.

The extra acceleration is VERY noticeable and the extra torque is very useful when towing my 4000 pound caravan. MPG has improved (not by much, but better than nothing!) around town and has remained the same on the long runs.

Unfortunately, I think you'll already have the 545RFE tranny, so won't be able to anything about the rise in highway RPM. As everyone has said so far, it really depends on what you use it for.
 
  #16  
Old 02-07-2013, 01:46 PM
MoparMan1991's Avatar
MoparMan1991
MoparMan1991 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Barksdale AFB, LA
Posts: 2,213
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DakinUK
I personally think going up (or down) one step in ratio isn't worth the cost, especially if you've got 4WD. I went from 3.55 to 4.10 on my V8 AWD and I'm so glad I didn't go for the 3.92. The difference between 3.55 and 3.92 is 10% where as 3.55 to 4.10 is 15%.

At 70mph, the engine went from 2100rpm to 2400rpm with the new gears. I didn't think that it would make much of a difference to the highway use but it was quite noticable. Luckerly, my truck has the 45RFE tranny which I decided to try reprogram by using a 545RFE controller off a 05 Grand Cherokee. Despite throwing a code about some "incompatibility issue" and putting all the PNR21 lights on at once, it works! I gained an extra overdrive gear that drops the RPM back down to same RPM it used to run with the old gears.

The extra acceleration is VERY noticeable and the extra torque is very useful when towing my 4000 pound caravan. MPG has improved (not by much, but better than nothing!) around town and has remained the same on the long runs.

Unfortunately, I think you'll already have the 545RFE tranny, so won't be able to anything about the rise in highway RPM. As everyone has said so far, it really depends on what you use it for.
I'm glad to see that someone else did the TCM swap. That extra OD gear is really nice when your hauling *** down the interstate.
 
  #17  
Old 02-07-2013, 03:44 PM
moe7404's Avatar
moe7404
moe7404 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my shop will not warranty non-stock parts. but WILL warranty labor. somthing to think about. but not all shops do it the same. what i didnt like doing my own work is that i had to do my own rework. course didnt we all.
 
  #18  
Old 02-23-2013, 10:25 PM
3.704sxt's Avatar
3.704sxt
3.704sxt is offline
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Damn, sounds like a bunch of work. It's either drop the 4x4 and swap in a front end from a 2wd, or spend twice the money.. I think I'll just leave it at this point. It would be used mostly for highway/backroads driving back and forth from school. I'll just leave the 3.55s in there for now.
 
  #19  
Old 02-24-2013, 02:09 PM
Tom A's Avatar
Tom A
Tom A is offline
Section Moderator
Dodge Forum Moderator
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 3.704sxt
Damn, sounds like a bunch of work. It's either drop the 4x4 and swap in a front end from a 2wd, or spend twice the money..
If you're ok with not having 4WD any more, you can just pull the front driveshaft out. You don't need to actually replace the front end with one from a 2WD. That way, if you decide to change the front to match the rear at a later time, you can put the front driveshaft back in and have 4WD again. It's pretty common to change them one at a time. You just have to remember, you CANNOT use 4WD with two different axle ratios!
 
  #20  
Old 02-27-2014, 07:00 AM
RDuck's Avatar
RDuck
RDuck is offline
Captain
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Man, I'm running 33's with 3:55's and in o/d at 75mph I'm doing 2000rpm.

It's way too low. When I swap I'm going 4:56.
 

Last edited by RDuck; 02-27-2014 at 07:18 AM.



Quick Reply: Rear end upgrades



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:05 PM.