2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

Hello all I have a 2002 Dakota slt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-11-2017, 09:02 PM
2002 dakota's Avatar
2002 dakota
2002 dakota is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Western missouri
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Hello all I have a 2002 Dakota slt

Just bought 2002 slt 4x4 extended cab dakota...paid $300 for great!! The Nad news it's 4.7 dropped 5 of 16 valve seats..my question is is it possible to rebuild this motor? If not what would be a good replacement ? I have read a few of the blogs about dropping in a 5.7 hemi and I am mechanically inclined so the idea doesn't scare me..but wonder if the 4.7 can be made to perform with say a turbo or two and building the engine...I also play with a roots type supercharger idea..I understand a hemi would make more power but how much could the trans take ( had real bad luck with dodge transmissions in the past ...so don't want to go crazy with the hp...is there a best year for the 4.7 if so what would work easiest without a bunch of wiring and computer stuff ( good with mechanicals not so much with comuters...any advice is appreciated..thks matthew
 
  #2  
Old 01-11-2017, 09:19 PM
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
magnethead is offline
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 8,006
Received 169 Likes on 154 Posts
Default

your options may or may not be limited by tone ring issues.

If you are lucky, you can re-head the motor you have and hope nothing else is hurt.
 
  #3  
Old 01-11-2017, 09:23 PM
2002 dakota's Avatar
2002 dakota
2002 dakota is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Western missouri
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tone ring??
 
  #4  
Old 01-11-2017, 09:32 PM
2002 dakota's Avatar
2002 dakota
2002 dakota is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Western missouri
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Also are there any other known issues to watch out for with this year dakota?
 
  #5  
Old 01-11-2017, 09:51 PM
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
magnethead is offline
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 8,006
Received 169 Likes on 154 Posts
Default

all years of dakota have known issues. Most of us put up with them. A majority of them are between the front bumper and back of the cab.

It sounds like you need to do some research on the 4.7 . You might learn there's a reason that chrysler revised the design several times before ending production in 2013.
 
  #6  
Old 01-11-2017, 10:05 PM
2002 dakota's Avatar
2002 dakota
2002 dakota is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Western missouri
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's one of the things I am trying to do here...is this the wrong forum for a what works in this year of truck?
 
  #7  
Old 01-12-2017, 02:19 PM
patchelect's Avatar
patchelect
patchelect is offline
Professional
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dalton, MA
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Reading between the lines I believe the answer to your question is that the engine wasn't exactly a gem and smart money would be on another motor completely. As for if the tranny will take any boost in power, the related topic would be to ask how many miles are on it? 40K would mean a completely different response than 240K. You have a $300 truck that might be better served by a reporter from a junk yard and that's all.

Just sayin'
 




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 PM.