2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

4.7 Vs. 5.2 (318)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-04-2008, 08:59 PM
Dakotamansam's Avatar
Dakotamansam
Dakotamansam is offline
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 4.7 Vs. 5.2 (318)

hi im looking to get my self into a new truck in a couple months. i cant decide between a 1999 or a 2002 or so. anyway im looking into the engines. is the 4.7 better on gas mileage? is there a big difference between performance? im also thinking of getting an exhaust and posibly other parts for it. are there more parts available for one engine compared to the other?
thanks
Sam
 
  #2  
Old 03-04-2008, 10:14 PM
TheePlaymaker's Avatar
TheePlaymaker
TheePlaymaker is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Willow Street, PA
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.2 (318)

4.7 is definitaly better on gas mileage however the 5.2 has more aftermarket parts. 5.2 seems to have really good low end torque and power were as the 4.7 feels more car like making more power in the mid to upper rpm range. Performance is the same pretty much. I love my 4.7 and would suggest it but you can't go wrong with either engine.
 
  #3  
Old 03-04-2008, 10:54 PM
big.bryant's Avatar
big.bryant
big.bryant is offline
Champion
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: University of Colorado-Boulder
Posts: 4,664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.2 (318)

yeah i have a 4.7 and it does the trick. for me the 5.2 is just too old of technology but as i said it is just me. the 4.7 or the 5.2 are still great engines that sound bad-*** if they are piped and air-intaked.
 
  #4  
Old 03-05-2008, 07:55 PM
scandal669's Avatar
scandal669
scandal669 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.2 (318)



Engines
Size liters /
cu. in

Horse- power
Torque
Transmission:
EPA city/hgwy

Consumer Guide Observed

ohc V8
4.7 / 287
230-235
295
5-speed manual: 14/18
4-speed automatic: 14/17
5-speed automatic: 15/20
5-speed manual: --
4-speed automatic: --
5-speed automatic: 16

ohv V8
5.2 / 318
230
300
5-speed manual: 14/19
4-speed automatic: 14/18
5-speed manual: --
4-speed automatic: 13.3


consumer auto guide ratings...as you can see, they are about the same. as far as the 318 being old technology, a V-8 is a V-8. chrysler has been making 318's since 1967 and have updated them as time goes on. there are a million of them out there so there will be parts for them forever. you can also swap some340 and 360 parts on a 318 also since they are the same engine block. i think it is a better and stronger engine from top to bottom and easier to modify if thats what you wanted to do.
 
  #5  
Old 03-05-2008, 09:46 PM
TheePlaymaker's Avatar
TheePlaymaker
TheePlaymaker is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Willow Street, PA
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.2 (318)

i def. think that their mpg ratings are off as far as real world numbers the 4.7 would most likely get better gas mileage in all situations vs a 5.2 with both engines set up the same.
 
  #6  
Old 03-05-2008, 10:41 PM
Twiztid's Avatar
Twiztid
Twiztid is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.2 (318)

I have owned both. Both will get similar MPG for daily driving, but the the 5.2 will get better MPG while towing due, prob due to the lower end torque. Towing is much nicer with the 5.2 let me tell ya. I say 4.7 for street trucks....5.2 for a truck that gets used like a truck. There are more parts for the 5.2 like said too, which is always a plus.





 
  #7  
Old 03-06-2008, 12:27 AM
jonnymagnum's Avatar
jonnymagnum
jonnymagnum is offline
Grand Champion
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ontario, canada
Posts: 6,645
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.2 (318)

I would go with the 318.
 
  #8  
Old 03-06-2008, 01:58 AM
wink2873's Avatar
wink2873
wink2873 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Norwalk, Ohio
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.2 (318)

318 is also more reliable and easier to work on.
 
  #9  
Old 03-06-2008, 10:37 AM
scandal669's Avatar
scandal669
scandal669 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.2 (318)

i wouldnt say the consumer ratings are that far off from real world. i did a search on here for gas mileages and everyone, even people with 4cyl trucks get around 15 on average. a few get better and a few get worse, but lets face it, if a person is really worried about MPG's, this is not the vehicle to get.
 
  #10  
Old 03-06-2008, 10:58 AM
jnellydodge's Avatar
jnellydodge
jnellydodge is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.2 (318)

Ive owned2 318's andhave ridden in dakota's with the 4.7, you can't go wrong with either they are both good motors. I lovedthe 318 in my dakota, plenty of power, and in the other ram it was alright too. If i had to choose between the two i would probably pick the 4.7because it seems to have a better tranny (automatic) behind it than the 318's did. As far as parts go there are all kinds of parts and accessories in the aftermarket for the 5.2, much more so than there is for the 4.7.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM.