2nd Gen Neon 2000 - 2005 2nd Gen Neon

2nd-Gen CAI "test" data

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 07-03-2007, 08:56 PM
j_son600's Avatar
j_son600
j_son600 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rocky Comfort, Missouri
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2nd-Gen CAI "test" data

Never been 160 on 4 wheels only 2, a couple times I have lifted my head off the tank to check my mirrors and had my head not perfectly strait, feels like its going to rip your head off.
 
  #12  
Old 07-03-2007, 11:22 PM
Izero's Avatar
Izero
Izero is offline
Champion
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,489
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: 2nd-Gen CAI "test" data

yea if u stick ur arm out of the car with ur plam facing forward at 160mph you will dislocate your shoulder.... or possibly break your arm.... but hey 160mph couldn't flip a car i mean Newtons laws dont apply to anything with four wheels right?
 
  #13  
Old 07-03-2007, 11:36 PM
Exubus's Avatar
Exubus
Exubus is offline
Champion
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 3,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2nd-Gen CAI "test" data

ORIGINAL: Izero

yea if u stick ur arm out of the car with ur plam facing forward at 160mph you will dislocate your shoulder.... or possibly break your arm.... but hey 160mph couldn't flip a car i mean Newtons laws dont apply to anything with four wheels right?
Oh yeah, very easily... just like sliding a car at 15 mph is enough to roll it in the right circumstances. But if I somehow could get my Neon going 160 mph, even as light as it is... there is no way I'm going to spin and roll out of control just by putting the damn window down. I've done enough CAD and conceptual stuff to know that models must be fine-tuned to become accurate... and the only way to do that is to look at it through common sense. I went 160 mph on an open road once... and will never do it again voluntarily... no one can argue that and call it smart. But anyway, just opening the window would not be enough to do it at 160.

More realistically, I'd be afraid of a deer walking out in front of me in a Neon at 160 mph... now that's some very realistic fear (oh yeah, except for the 160 mph part ha ha).
 
  #14  
Old 07-04-2007, 06:12 AM
HankL's Avatar
HankL
HankL is offline
Champion
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,313
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default RE: 2nd-Gen CAI "test" data

Putting a probe for your low pressure gauge
in the 'plenum' just below the windshield
(where the vents get air)
might yield some interesting data.'

On 'blunt vehicles' this area has the highest
'stagnation' pressures'...higher than in front of the grille.

On highly aerodynamic vehicles the area in front of the grille
will have the higher stagnation pressures.

The Neon has got a pretty good Cd...maybe 0.33

If you want to see some 'eye popping' pressures
place a probe just above the top of the tire
with the opening facing forward...here the air speed
is a surprising twice vehicle speed.....due to
'cycloid' tire tread motion.
 



Quick Reply: 2nd-Gen CAI "test" data



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 AM.