r/t cam
#3
RE: r/t cam
I'm pretty sure these are all the correct cam specs...
Stock 96-05 SOHC Camshaft:
Lift: 0.307", 0.276
Duration: @ .060" - 196* intake, 214* exhaust.
Magnum Camshaft:
Lift: .344" intake, .315" exhaust
Duration: @ .060" - 212* intake, 228* exhaust.
Crane 12 Camshaft:
Lift: .355" intake, .315" exhaust
Duration: (intake/exhaust). @ .050" - 204* (intake), 200* (exhaust)
Comp 200 Camshaft:
ift: .356" intake, .336" exhaust
Duration: Advertised - 256266* (intake/exhaust). @ .050" - 200* (intake), 206* (exhaust)
Stock 96-05 SOHC Camshaft:
Lift: 0.307", 0.276
Duration: @ .060" - 196* intake, 214* exhaust.
Magnum Camshaft:
Lift: .344" intake, .315" exhaust
Duration: @ .060" - 212* intake, 228* exhaust.
Crane 12 Camshaft:
Lift: .355" intake, .315" exhaust
Duration: (intake/exhaust). @ .050" - 204* (intake), 200* (exhaust)
Comp 200 Camshaft:
ift: .356" intake, .336" exhaust
Duration: Advertised - 256266* (intake/exhaust). @ .050" - 200* (intake), 206* (exhaust)
#4
#6
RE: r/t cam
I have debated the idea of bee-hive springs and larger stainless steel valve from mopar performance but would like to know what cam would be the best fit for a D.D. with some added pop in the cam. Sounds like the comp 200 would be a nice addition but the car is an ATX so would the low speed drivability be comprimised significantly. In other words I would like to still be able to drive in school zones.
#7
Trending Topics
#9
RE: r/t cam
I would assume the R/T cam can be thrown into a non-R/T head no problem... but what significant gains could really be seen? 5 hp or so? Has anyone here tried this with a non-RT motor and had significant results? I always have had the belief that compression was always the biggest key, i.e. deck-to-TDC difference between the non-R/T and the R/T motor... this same premise usually applies to every other NA motor you typically come across...
Anyway, any input on this?
Anyway, any input on this?
#10
RE: r/t cam
ORIGINAL: N_gin
Do you have tochange valve springs with the comp 400?
Do you have tochange valve springs with the comp 400?
ORIGINAL: contagious19
i thought they said da 03 or 02 mag cam was a lil more stronger dan da rest
i thought they said da 03 or 02 mag cam was a lil more stronger dan da rest
ORIGINAL: magnum04RT
03neon, would you recommend the comp 400 cam for the magnum motor? its supposed to be made for it basically, from what ive read. did you replace valves, springs and all that good stuff when you put yours in?
03neon, would you recommend the comp 400 cam for the magnum motor? its supposed to be made for it basically, from what ive read. did you replace valves, springs and all that good stuff when you put yours in?
ORIGINAL: IowaNeon04
I would assume the R/T cam can be thrown into a non-R/T head no problem... but what significant gains could really be seen? 5 hp or so? Has anyone here tried this with a non-RT motor and had significant results? I always have had the belief that compression was always the biggest key, i.e. deck-to-TDC difference between the non-R/T and the R/T motor... this same premise usually applies to every other NA motor you typically come across...
Anyway, any input on this?
I would assume the R/T cam can be thrown into a non-R/T head no problem... but what significant gains could really be seen? 5 hp or so? Has anyone here tried this with a non-RT motor and had significant results? I always have had the belief that compression was always the biggest key, i.e. deck-to-TDC difference between the non-R/T and the R/T motor... this same premise usually applies to every other NA motor you typically come across...
Anyway, any input on this?