who's dumber?...
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
From: Desmoines iowa
Dont start with me andpto not here to casue any trouble and not airwolf anymore and your the only one who is going after me. . Pretty happy with my sxt but with the miles I have on her now time to start looking for a new ride of somekind and always wanted a stang and the v6s 2011 are mean lookin and great gas mileage and awesome hp and not too pricey for me.
Last edited by showsxt; Jun 16, 2010 at 10:33 PM.
Professional
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: No. Platte NE
I raced a LS1 Trans Am for ****s and giggles awhile back.. Little did we know, there was a cop in the parking lot watching us rev and whatnot. We go, I get my **** rocked like im standing still, he gets pulled over. Ticketed for racing and speeding. I say we were both stupid..
Your story sir, on the BMW's part was dumber. I would assume most anyone would play along with a BMW
Your story sir, on the BMW's part was dumber. I would assume most anyone would play along with a BMW
2nd gen neon peace keeper
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,554
Likes: 1
From: Hornell NY
Heavy compared to...[sub]compact cars like Neons? Sure, obviously. Heavy compared to Camaros, Challengers...it's main competition; no. It is still lighter, and costs less. A 305 HP V6 car that weighs 3,600 LBS, has a 2.73 gear ratio (insanely high IMO, but that's how the gas mileage is that high no doubt), that does the 1/4 mile in the 14 second range isn't really "slow." Those are 1/4 mile times are only ~0.7 seconds slower than the 6.1L V8 SRT-8 Challenger that costs MUCH more ($42,000 vs. $22,000), from a 3.7L V6. So, heavy and slow? Not by any means really.
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
From: Desmoines iowa
Not the 2011 the v6 stangs are way better for performance and gas . I test drove one again today and Im in love with the new stangs I would get the v8 but the v6s are just as nice and cheaper in price and better in gas mileage and 305hp is way enough speed for me.
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
From: Desmoines iowa
Yeah the gts have over 400hp thats way to much for me and I probably would kill myself in anything more and the v6s now have a very nice dual exhaust but I would get a borla later on anyways.
Section Moderator
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,584
Likes: 7
From: Northern California
i always thought the new stangs weighed in at around 3,900 (i may be wrong, wont be the first and wont be the last, lol) but i work at a gm dealership and i know for sure the new camaro 's are slow to me, even being the ss version i am just not impressed with it for the price tag.... i knew the cars were in the 14s, and yeah it is not to bad.... but something about a 6 cylinder mustang i just dont like.... just me, but something about being a v6 mustang takes all the fun out of it....
Last edited by darthroush; Jun 17, 2010 at 10:13 PM.
Captain
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
From: san jose
The older body styles were underpowered. Agreed; especially the V6 models. Good luck doing that with the new ones. Ford finally got people want more power in them, regardless. The GT's come factory with over 400HP. The "Cobra" models are going to be even more powerful when they come out.