Before i get neck deep
#12
Anything that adds more power will create more stress on an engine. A bad tune will make it worse and a good tune will actually be able to lessen it, but both in a different way. The SRT engine is a completely different thing than the 2.0L though. The SRT engine is made with stronger parts to handle said power.
You like Mustangs...what can handle more power: the 4.6L 2V or a 4.6L 4V? The 2V has "standard" parts whereas the 4V has forged parts. The 2V can handle up to about 450HP at the crank; the 4V is in the 600HP, maybe 700HP range, IIRC. Same thing with the 2.0L 2V and the 2.4L 4V.
You like Mustangs...what can handle more power: the 4.6L 2V or a 4.6L 4V? The 2V has "standard" parts whereas the 4V has forged parts. The 2V can handle up to about 450HP at the crank; the 4V is in the 600HP, maybe 700HP range, IIRC. Same thing with the 2.0L 2V and the 2.4L 4V.
Last edited by darthroush; 03-29-2011 at 05:09 PM.
#13
#14
Dodge/Chrysler just can't build a decent auto (anymore, perhaps). You can't really go wrong with a manual in a performance street car. They will handle more power.
The best route I know of with an SRT swap is to get a PT Cruiser GT transmission, if you want an auto. It's an auto built to be mated to the same turbo 2.4L. One could just go for the PT GT engine/trans combo if they could find it.
The best route I know of with an SRT swap is to get a PT Cruiser GT transmission, if you want an auto. It's an auto built to be mated to the same turbo 2.4L. One could just go for the PT GT engine/trans combo if they could find it.
#15
Yeah where I got both acrs they also have a few turbo cruisers so I think I will sell the acr and do the cruiser swap into my auto sounds like a cooler and more unique approach to doing a turbo swap seeing not many do the cruiser swap than the srt swap. THanks darth for giving me that idea. I would love to stay with a stonger auto turbo .
#17