SRT-4 Rear Section on a 2nd Gen.
#11
RE: SRT-4 Rear Section on a 2nd Gen.
You never have a "true dual exhaust" because our motors are I4's so I don't know exactly why you said that. The only way I see someone could get a dual exhaust is by making a custome header and running two straight pipes back which would be interesting to see. lol
#12
RE: SRT-4 Rear Section on a 2nd Gen.
ORIGINAL: 04 mo neon
You never have a "true dual exhaust" because our motors are I4's so I don't know exactly why you said that. The only way I see someone could get a dual exhaust is by making a custome header and running two straight pipes back which would be interesting to see. lol
You never have a "true dual exhaust" because our motors are I4's so I don't know exactly why you said that. The only way I see someone could get a dual exhaust is by making a custome header and running two straight pipes back which would be interesting to see. lol
#14
#16
RE: SRT-4 Rear Section on a 2nd Gen.
ORIGINAL: 04 mo neon
Picky picky, when do have to be that politically correct in here. Though, the proper wording would be dual exhust tiped muffler I guess.
Picky picky, when do have to be that politically correct in here. Though, the proper wording would be dual exhust tiped muffler I guess.
But anyway, I would stay away from the SRT-4 rear section unless you want to add a glasspack to the midpipe also...if you dont add the glasspack the sound will be very harsh. Here are two sound clips of the SRT-4 rear section on a standard 2.0.
http://s97.photobucket.com/albums/l2...xaust_0001.flv
http://s97.photobucket.com/albums/l2...tonregneon.flv
In my opinion the sound is horrific...[:-]
#17
RE: SRT-4 Rear Section on a 2nd Gen.
ORIGINAL: 03neonRT
I believe the proper term is "Dual Exhaust Outlets"...
But anyway, I would stay away from the SRT-4 rear section unless you want to add a glasspack to the midpipe also...if you dont add the glasspack the sound will be very harsh. Here are two sound clips of the SRT-4 rear section on a standard 2.0.
http://s97.photobucket.com/albums/l2...xaust_0001.flv
http://s97.photobucket.com/albums/l2...tonregneon.flv
In my opinion the sound is horrific...[:-]
ORIGINAL: 04 mo neon
Picky picky, when do have to be that politically correct in here. Though, the proper wording would be dual exhust tiped muffler I guess.
Picky picky, when do have to be that politically correct in here. Though, the proper wording would be dual exhust tiped muffler I guess.
But anyway, I would stay away from the SRT-4 rear section unless you want to add a glasspack to the midpipe also...if you dont add the glasspack the sound will be very harsh. Here are two sound clips of the SRT-4 rear section on a standard 2.0.
http://s97.photobucket.com/albums/l2...xaust_0001.flv
http://s97.photobucket.com/albums/l2...tonregneon.flv
In my opinion the sound is horrific...[:-]
#18
#19
RE: SRT-4 Rear Section on a 2nd Gen.
Although opinions differ... especially when it comes to the ear.
I loved mine, even before the turbo. I also got nothing but compliments from the locals. The only people that i've heard say they didn't like it are from people on forums. one, they never done it themselves... two, they've never heard it in person. only whats been posted through a sound clip, which can differ from the actuall sound. three, they are just repeating what they read in another post. or four, they truely don't like the sound.
no disrespect to anybody, some people really don't like it. Funny though, i was told all the same things back when i did it. Although nobody had attempted it at the time they still told me it would sound like sh_t. I was the first on the .org to do it back in Sept of 2003.
anyway, without a glasspack... it does sound liek sh_t!
Rear section, no glasspack. sounds like poo: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...79781928270438
Glasspack install: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...61710933127816
Warmed up idle and rev. w/ glasspack: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...89678715798718
WOT Sound via dyno vid: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...71844305670787
(yes, i know they are talking sh_t... lol nice friends)
OT bonus vid: How we do in New England (before i left anyway): http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...16115477958038
k3v
I loved mine, even before the turbo. I also got nothing but compliments from the locals. The only people that i've heard say they didn't like it are from people on forums. one, they never done it themselves... two, they've never heard it in person. only whats been posted through a sound clip, which can differ from the actuall sound. three, they are just repeating what they read in another post. or four, they truely don't like the sound.
no disrespect to anybody, some people really don't like it. Funny though, i was told all the same things back when i did it. Although nobody had attempted it at the time they still told me it would sound like sh_t. I was the first on the .org to do it back in Sept of 2003.
anyway, without a glasspack... it does sound liek sh_t!
Rear section, no glasspack. sounds like poo: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...79781928270438
Glasspack install: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...61710933127816
Warmed up idle and rev. w/ glasspack: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...89678715798718
WOT Sound via dyno vid: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...71844305670787
(yes, i know they are talking sh_t... lol nice friends)
OT bonus vid: How we do in New England (before i left anyway): http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...16115477958038
k3v