New style M1
#1
08-19-2007, 07:31 PM
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New style M1
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...p;autoview=sku
anyone have anything to say about the new M1? Any reviews on it or anything
anyone have anything to say about the new M1? Any reviews on it or anything
#2
08-19-2007, 09:15 PM
All Star
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Belle Plaine, Minnesota
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#3
08-19-2007, 09:39 PM
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#4
08-19-2007, 11:24 PM
RE: New style M1
is this the only M1 that they make for fuel injection.
http://home.ec.rr.com/mhoover/Mopar_M1.htm
Just a single plane 2bbl style
http://home.ec.rr.com/mhoover/Mopar_M1.htm
Just a single plane 2bbl style
#5
08-20-2007, 08:40 AM
Record Breaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New style M1
There is another 4bbl version for mpi. It comes with an adapter that will allow the stock type tb to be used. It is mainly for high stall/revs though. Hughes is adapting an Edelbrock Air gap dual plane for use on the mpi Magnum engine, but, according to KRC's dyno, it gains nothing over the M1 and costs quite a bit more.
#6
08-20-2007, 09:14 AM
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New style M1
ORIGINAL: mopowar
There is another 4bbl version for mpi. It comes with an adapter that will allow the stock type tb to be used. It is mainly for high stall/revs though. Hughes is adapting an Edelbrock Air gap dual plane for use on the mpi Magnum engine, but, according to KRC's dyno, it gains nothing over the M1 and costs quite a bit more.
There is another 4bbl version for mpi. It comes with an adapter that will allow the stock type tb to be used. It is mainly for high stall/revs though. Hughes is adapting an Edelbrock Air gap dual plane for use on the mpi Magnum engine, but, according to KRC's dyno, it gains nothing over the M1 and costs quite a bit more.
#7
08-20-2007, 10:36 AM
Record Breaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New style M1
Cut and paste from another forum by Marty from KRC:
Quote:
The numbers where actually 2 off less, but the same peak rpm, peak TQ. No change in the powerband or how it responds on the street. Thats why I did the dyno to see what TQ gains would be affected, could care less about the peak HP.
Tell the Delphi boys making comments, that no GSC/PPH header ever compared to the Ram Pacesetter 1 3/4 long tubes either. I went from 460tq with a LT 1 5/8 Hooker Header to 492tq by changing to this header on the DTS dyno.
Back on topic, no change anywhere in the powerband compared to a untouched M-1 2bbl.
end quote
Off topic: What are the rules here about linking to other Dodge forums?
Quote:
The numbers where actually 2 off less, but the same peak rpm, peak TQ. No change in the powerband or how it responds on the street. Thats why I did the dyno to see what TQ gains would be affected, could care less about the peak HP.
Tell the Delphi boys making comments, that no GSC/PPH header ever compared to the Ram Pacesetter 1 3/4 long tubes either. I went from 460tq with a LT 1 5/8 Hooker Header to 492tq by changing to this header on the DTS dyno.
Back on topic, no change anywhere in the powerband compared to a untouched M-1 2bbl.
end quote
Off topic: What are the rules here about linking to other Dodge forums?