2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Which is better for hauling 5.2or 5.9?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 11:28 AM
  #31  
Kev_n_AZ's Avatar
Kev_n_AZ
Banned
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Which is better for hauling 5.2or 5.9?

ORIGINAL: sszabo

Heh, I really appreciate all of the reponse. You guys are giving me a lot of things to consider. If it was a perfect world and I had wheelbarrels of money, no question I'd go with the diesel. The point is I'm ona budget and I'm sure most of you can relate. I'm looking at spending 10-13K tops and I'd say the diesel isn't going to happen. I am also looking at it being as fuel effiicent as possible (if that is possible with a truck), but also have to consider the towing capabilities. Part of the issue is that I don't know what I'm going to be hauling yet, but don't wantto limit my options quiteyet if a great deal comes along. I'd say a 25 footer is the longest I'd be looking at. That said, if you have any other bits of wisdom, don't hesitate as I sure like hearing from your experiences.
look real hard. and dont get in a hurry. a CTD is waiting for YOU!




http://phoenix.craigslist.org/car/479807578.html

http://phoenix.craigslist.org/car/477524227.html

check around.

www.craigslist.com
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 12:18 PM
  #32  
CowboyBob's Avatar
CowboyBob
Record Breaker
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Which is better for hauling 5.2or 5.9?

I have a 96 1500 with a 5.2 in it and it sucked for towing. If you want to go more than 65 MPH, you had better be going down hill. And you will have to take it out of OD too, or you will burn up your tranny. I towed a 2 horse bumper pull with 2 ***** and gear it weighed about 5k-6k lbs. It was all that it could do to keep up with traffic on the highway. It also gets about 8MPG while towing this trailer.

In 2001 I got a 2500 diesel and can tow the same trailerand 2 horses and you don't even know that it is back there. I have never had to take it out of OD while towing this trailer and I get 14MPG while towing it. I get 20-21 MPG when empty.

The programmers do not work on the gas engines, but the diesels are a different story! If youhave a 2nd or 3rd gen diesel and don't have some type of programmer on it, then you do not know what you are missing!!

 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 12:22 PM
  #33  
THEGOLDPRO's Avatar
THEGOLDPRO
Captain
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: southbury CT
Default RE: Which is better for hauling 5.2or 5.9?

ORIGINAL: 1980blackfiveoh

Neither: go with the V10!
hahah my 5.9 pulls good, but my v10 just embarrises the crap out of it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 04:15 PM
  #34  
sszabo's Avatar
sszabo
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default RE: Which is better for hauling 5.2or 5.9?

Anyone know how dependable the V10 is? It sounds like its got the ***** I'm looking for hauling, but I want to know about it's reliability including economy (ie fuel mileage).
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 08:37 PM
  #35  
THEGOLDPRO's Avatar
THEGOLDPRO
Captain
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: southbury CT
Default RE: Which is better for hauling 5.2or 5.9?

ORIGINAL: sszabo

Anyone know how dependable the V10 is? It sounds like its got the ***** I'm looking for hauling, but I want to know about it's reliability including economy (ie fuel mileage).
from what i hear they are great motors, no real problems with mine so far,.as for gas milage it gets just about the same as my 5.9 litre if not alittle better,and yes it will pull anything you put behind it without hesitation.
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 06:02 AM
  #36  
HankL's Avatar
HankL
Champion
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,313
Likes: 8
Default RE: Which is better for hauling 5.2or 5.9?

There have been some block cracking issues with the cast iron Dodge V10
reported on forums...more than with the v8s but not so many as to be a great worry.

There have also be block cracking issues with some of the Cummins I6 diesels from the foundary in Brazil a few years ago.

It always is worth repeating that the key to successful towing
is stopping in emergency situations
not engine power to go fast.
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 08:24 AM
  #37  
erikb45's Avatar
erikb45
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Which is better for hauling 5.2or 5.9?

diesel = more power
diesel = better gas mileage

do the math on how much you drive the gas savings might just give you motivation to get a diesel.
next time i will!!!!

1000 miles a month @12 mpg (5.2 not towing) @ $3.15 per gallon (ny) = $262.50

1000 miles a month @20 mpg (cummins not towing) @ 3.59per gal (ny) = $179.50

difference $83 a month
x 12 months
996 per year


get the diesel keep it for a couple years and it pays for itself and will hold its value much better than a gas motor
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #38  
big truck man's Avatar
big truck man
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Which is better for hauling 5.2or 5.9?

ORIGINAL: sszabo

Forget wasting your time on the last post. I'm not seriously considering the 5.7. I was just trying to get all the info. ,you know? Okay, so what about a 2500 with a 5.9? Sounds like a decent combination. Anyone out there using it for hauling? As well, what kind of commuter mileage do you get?
See below, I have this setup with 4.10 grears. Pulling is OK at best I would say. About every three months I drag around a 6-7k skid loader, not every far, on a 16' tamdem axle trailer. I get around 11.5-12.5 MPG, daily driving up and down hills on back roads. Best I ever got was 13.5 on the highway.

I drove a friend of mines 2500 with V10 with a heavy trailer, it pulled real nice. It's defiantly not like his new Cummins. I was told the V10 was getting 16-18 MPG daily no problem.It just all comes down to what you can find that is in good condition and for a fair price.
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 10:56 AM
  #39  
ryans590's Avatar
ryans590
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 1
From:
Default RE: Which is better for hauling 5.2or 5.9?

ORIGINAL: erikb45

1000 miles a month @12 mpg (5.2 not towing) @ $3.15 per gallon (ny) = $262.50
1000 miles a month @20 mpg (cummins not towing) @ 3.59per gal (ny) = $179.50
holey crap diesel is MORE than gas there...that sucks here its $0.10-$0.15 per LEITER cheaper
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #40  
padodgeram's Avatar
padodgeram
Record Breaker
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,440
Likes: 1
From: PA
Default RE: Which is better for hauling 5.2or 5.9?

ORIGINAL: ryans590

ORIGINAL: erikb45

1000 miles a month @12 mpg (5.2 not towing) @ $3.15 per gallon (ny) = $262.50
1000 miles a month @20 mpg (cummins not towing) @ 3.59per gal (ny) = $179.50
holey crap diesel is MORE than gas there...that sucks here its $0.10-$0.15 per LEITER cheaper
run home heating fuel 2.49 in pa..and dont even say you cant run it in a diesel motor cause you can..
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 AM.