2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Which is better for hauling 5.2or 5.9?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 08:44 AM
  #51  
murfman's Avatar
murfman
Amateur
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 2
Default RE: Which is better for hauling 5.2or 5.9?

That I 40 hill is the pne I referred to in my post. The 5.9 hated that strech...
I get my oil for free Do some work for a company that packages M1 and distributes it. I did a scratch my bac and I'll scratch yours with the owner as soon as I found out what they had there. So I guess its technically NOT free, but its no cash out of my pocket, and with my toy fleet up to 9 vehicles it adds up fast.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 08:50 AM
  #52  
Gary-L's Avatar
Gary-L
Legend
Veteran: Navy
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 8
From: Central Oklahoma
Default RE: Which is better for hauling 5.2or 5.9?

ORIGINAL: HankL

I stand corrected.
Mexican foundary has not had problems,
it is the Brazilian foundary.

http://www.stamey.info/Truck/Cummins53BlockFAQ.htm

In the classic VW world, every shuns Brazillian parts. They have been ****e for years. Rotors barely last 6 months on a vehicle and the sheet metal is always crapola with lousy pressings, bad fitting, etc. I don't know why the Brazillians can't make anything decent.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:50 PM.