2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Those with 35's, 4.56, and auto trans, please read:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 02-29-2008, 05:31 PM
TheForce55555's Avatar
TheForce55555
TheForce55555 is offline
All Star
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southwest, Pa
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Those with 35's, 4.56, and auto trans, please read:

http://thedieselgarage.com/projects/...c/tirecalc.htm

4th calculator down
 
  #12  
Old 02-29-2008, 06:03 PM
zique's Avatar
zique
zique is offline
Captain
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Those with 35's, 4.56, and auto trans, please read:

ORIGINAL: Silver_Dodge

Your manual trans is 1:1, the automatic is something like .69:1 with the torque converter.
welp, you learn something new every day, eh? Can't say I've ever owned an automatic in the 11 vehicles I've been through. They're still foreign to me. Sorry I can't help ya.

Neon, you know you can just jack up your rear end and find out your gears, right? Given your revs, I'd say you are either 4.10s or 4.56s, but I really haven't had my 4.56's up to 70 yet as I'm still in the early stages of breaking them in.
 
  #13  
Old 02-29-2008, 06:10 PM
kowboydmac's Avatar
kowboydmac
kowboydmac is offline
All Star
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Those with 35's, 4.56, and auto trans, please read:

What would be some good gearing for a 2wd? I just want to increase MPG and maybe get a jump off the line.

got a 1996 360 5.9L 2wd.
 
  #14  
Old 02-29-2008, 07:58 PM
rabbler's Avatar
rabbler
rabbler is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Those with 35's, 4.56, and auto trans, please read:

The NV3500 is .73 in 5th gear
 
  #15  
Old 02-29-2008, 09:35 PM
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
jasonw is offline
Site Moderator
Dodge Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 11 Posts
Default RE: Those with 35's, 4.56, and auto trans, please read:

ORIGINAL: kowboydmac

What would be some good gearing for a 2wd? I just want to increase MPG and maybe get a jump off the line.

got a 1996 360 5.9L 2wd.
Probably going to be one or the other bud, not both. Higher gears = more off the line, but poor gas mileage. Lower gears = better MPG, but worse take off.

Some here have experienced different results, but I believe thats the general rule of thumb.
 
  #16  
Old 02-29-2008, 09:49 PM
iitywygms's Avatar
iitywygms
iitywygms is offline
Amateur
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Those with 35's, 4.56, and auto trans, please read:

I just purchased my truck 2 weeks ago. Yesterday I went out to check the gearing by lifting the tires and doin one revolution with the tire. Driveshaft spun 4.5 turns. YES! I have 35 inch tires so I will check and report back when I get the info. I am not sure if the speedo is correct thou. Give me a couple of days.
 
  #17  
Old 02-29-2008, 10:11 PM
Cereal Killer's Avatar
Cereal Killer
Cereal Killer is offline
Champion
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Those with 35's, 4.56, and auto trans, please read:

ORIGINAL: jason.w

ORIGINAL: kowboydmac

What would be some good gearing for a 2wd? I just want to increase MPG and maybe get a jump off the line.

got a 1996 360 5.9L 2wd.
Probably going to be one or the other bud, not both. Higher gears = more off the line, but poor gas mileage. Lower gears = better MPG, but worse take off.

Some here have experienced different results, but I believe thats the general rule of thumb.
Actually that's *** backwards.

Lower gears = more off the line

Higher gears = better top end
 
  #18  
Old 02-29-2008, 10:44 PM
TheForce55555's Avatar
TheForce55555
TheForce55555 is offline
All Star
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southwest, Pa
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Those with 35's, 4.56, and auto trans, please read:

I think he was talking Higher as in numericallynot it the ratio aspect
 
  #19  
Old 02-29-2008, 11:14 PM
kowboydmac's Avatar
kowboydmac
kowboydmac is offline
All Star
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Those with 35's, 4.56, and auto trans, please read:

Well then for the gears, I guess jump. I can improve MPG through air intake, tune-ups, all that jazz. Is it even worth it though? I only use it as my DD.
 
  #20  
Old 02-29-2008, 11:20 PM
padodgeram's Avatar
padodgeram
padodgeram is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 2,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Those with 35's, 4.56, and auto trans, please read:

ORIGINAL: kowboydmac

Well then for the gears, I guess jump. I can improve MPG through air intake, tune-ups, all that jazz. Is it even worth it though? I only use it as my DD.
Does a bear **** in the woods ??
 


Quick Reply: Those with 35's, 4.56, and auto trans, please read:



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:40 PM.