2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Interstate Driving

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 03-13-2008, 05:07 PM
tj1320's Avatar
tj1320
tj1320 is offline
Professional
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Interstate Driving

ORIGINAL: dusty_duster

If your truck is downshifting in that tiny hill, there's something wrong with it. Maybe a clogged catalytic converter?
Maybe so. That is the stock cat on there with 107,000 miles and 10 yearson it. I was thinking it shouldn't be downshifting on a little hill like that but I'm also new to Dodge trucks. I read something the other day that said that Dodge changed to the 3rd gen not only for improved looks/technology, but also because of complaints about performance from the 2nd gens. That is a big reason why I brought this up. I wish I would have posted that pic sooner since it pretty much explains everything.
 
  #22  
Old 03-13-2008, 05:09 PM
tj1320's Avatar
tj1320
tj1320 is offline
Professional
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Interstate Driving

ORIGINAL: TheForce55555


[blockquote]quote:

ORIGINAL: TheForce55555

Those mods should help a little but not much, The best thing to do is upgrade to 3.92 or 4.10 gear ratio to make the O/D more useful

2000 RPM seems to be have a good power and decent gas mileage, and you can pull most hills without losing speed
[/blockquote]



Not in this truck, LOL. 2,000 RPM = downshifting out of OD even on the smallest little uphill grade. I'm talkin' just a little bit above what would be considered a flat surface. I've never had or witnessedthis problem in any other V8 truck I've been in. Steep hills? Sure. But not little ones
.


I meant 2000 RPM at 60 MPH
Oh, okay. Big difference in that case.
 
  #23  
Old 03-14-2008, 07:57 AM
HankL's Avatar
HankL
HankL is offline
Champion
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,313
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default RE: Interstate Driving

it is true
and I completely agree with
that instead of talking about 3.42, 3.55, 4.56
and so forth
it is far better
to calculate the MPH you are going in each gear
and divide that by the thousands of rpm you are going.

For example
if you are going 80 mph in overdrive gear at 2000 rpm
that is 40 MPG/thousand rpm

it is true that a vehicle with different tire diameters
and trans gearsets
can confuse
like the Tundra and Ridgeline
which have high number diff gears but low number overdrives to compensate

40 mph/1000
is approximately the best 'flat highway' ratio for best fuel economy

17 mph/1000 is a good ratio for acceleration in city driving

having a transmission with 7 gears
evenly spaced up to a maximum of 40 mph/1000
is highly desirable if the trans is also reliable and durable

keep in mind that an unlocked torque converter
is like an additional gear
that varies from as high as 1.7 when the vehicle is still moving slow
to as low as 1.1 as it approaches max rpm and a gear change
 



Quick Reply: Interstate Driving



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 AM.