2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

4.10 gears vs. 265 tires

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 1, 2008 | 11:37 AM
  #41  
Boostl33k's Avatar
Boostl33k
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 4.10 gears vs. 265 tires

So no i would not for the rear but possbily for the front? I think thats what you ment by "only one for the rear"
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 12:40 PM
  #42  
pcfixerpro's Avatar
pcfixerpro
Champion
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,570
Likes: 0
Default RE: 4.10 gears vs. 265 tires

He said the front, the carrier split is 3.92. If you buy a "thick gear" thats 4.10, you can use the smaller carrier. If you get regular size 4.10 for the front, then... you will need a new carrier.
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 02:28 PM
  #43  
Boostl33k's Avatar
Boostl33k
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 4.10 gears vs. 265 tires

So when you say "thick gear" that means the ring diameter or the pinion shaft diameter?
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 02:36 PM
  #44  
mstephen89's Avatar
mstephen89
Captain
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 4.10 gears vs. 265 tires

honestly I'm not 100% positive what it means, all I know is that a "thick gear" is what is needed to not have to change your current carrier.
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 04:25 PM
  #45  
turkeyhunter1962's Avatar
turkeyhunter1962
All Star
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
From: Belle Plaine, Minnesota
Default RE: 4.10 gears vs. 265 tires

for the thick gear, the side profile is actually thicker than a normal 4.10 gear profile. While I have not personally seen this, I believe that it has to do with the pinion being smaller and requiring the gear to stand taller. Compare the side views of a quarter pounder to a Big Mac. The Big Mac is thicker.
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 06:35 PM
  #46  
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
Legend
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 13
From: DFW, Texas
Default RE: 4.10 gears vs. 265 tires

Mmmm...quarter pounder...
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 08:16 PM
  #47  
mopowar's Avatar
mopowar
Record Breaker
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Va
Default RE: 4.10 gears vs. 265 tires

ORIGINAL: Cereal Killer

For increased mpg:

-Take the big tires off it
-Lose the spare tire
-Lose the Tailgate
-Lose the back seat if you don't use it
-Lose the A/C system
-Keep a light foot on the skinny pedal
-Get a less restrictive air cleaner (just use the search button for that one, there's a million threads, even if they are 90% full of ****, I'm sure you'll find something useful)
-Search "Fastman 52mm throttle body"
- Less restrictive exhaust system

For increased performance, just type that into the search function, you'll find all you need to know and more. Good luck, and welcome to the forum
Except for the stigma portrayed by the username (CK- I love me some cereal after a blast too), I believe that this should be the default statement when someone clicks the 2nd Gen button here at DF. You know- I have read this and understand it- click yes to enter. This answers 99.9% of all the stuff posted here in a nice friendly way.

Hey, I'm new here. How can I make this pig faster and use less fuel.

We've seen the replies that people get. Some are down right un-friendly. Cereal Killer just summed it up in 200 words or less (that's what they say it takes now to keep the shallow interested whilst surfing).
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 09:03 PM
  #48  
Texas Ram's Avatar
Texas Ram
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default RE: 4.10 gears vs. 265 tires

well boys, thanks for the replies. some good, some not so good. guess i will figure this out on my own.
see ya!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #49  
Cereal Killer's Avatar
Cereal Killer
Champion
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 5
From:
Default RE: 4.10 gears vs. 265 tires

ORIGINAL: 01DodgeRam360

ORIGINAL: Cereal Killer

For increased mpg:

-Take the big tires off it
-Lose the spare tire
-Lose the Tailgate
-Lose the back seat if you don't use it
-Lose the A/C system
-Keep a light foot on the skinny pedal
-Get a less restrictive air cleaner (just use the search button for that one, there's a million threads, even if they are 90% full of ****, I'm sure you'll find something useful)
-Search "Fastman 52mm throttle body"
- Less restrictive exhaust system

For increased performance, just type that into the search function, you'll find all you need to know and more. Good luck, and welcome to the forum
Personally, I don't think taking the tailgate off and the A/C system out is a good idea. For one, not having a tailgate can cause damage to the bed rails because they aren't being supported anymore. It also is proven time and time again that without a tailgate, winds will actually go into the bed and cause more drag compared to a gate up. Not to mention, it looks trashy as ****. Also, A/C is a good thing. You are devaluing the reasale of your truck when you start taking out nice additions to the vehicle. Plus, neither of these things will do anything for mpgs that will be noticable.

As Cereal said, taking the 35" tires off would help, but your probably like me, and defiantly do not want to do that. But Cereal is right about the pedal, just be easy on it. Our trucks are powerhouses and can go good, but don't always be romping on it, it's a truck, they aren't meant to be raced. Free flowing exhaust entailing performance muffler and higher flow cat will free up horsepower and gain mpgs. With all of this said, don't look into that much. An engine is an engine, it's always going to have a baseline for mpgs. I have put an intake, longtube headers with an o/r y-pipe, flowmaster exhaust with a gutted cat...and guess what, my mileage is the same when I got it. It can go either way for me. If I'm taking it slow, then sure, I'll gain a mpg throughout the day, but usually it's contradicted when I'm driving it a little harder or towing something, then all of the hard work goes right down the tubes and I'm back to my standard 12.5 city....which to me, is not bad at all. For a 360 with 35" tires, I'm getting great gas mileage. I just feel bad for the guys out there paying the big gas bills with the ugly trucks, now that I could not bare.
Yeah it will lower the resale value some, but he didn't ask about that. He asked what could get him better mileage. Losing the weight of the condensor, and the fact that the wind will now hit your radiator directly (stays cooler easier), and the weight of the other components, plus having a shorter routed serpentine belt (and this will give you a couple extra horsepower) will deffinetly net you SOME difference.

I didn't know you got a new intake. Did you get an M1, or did you buy one of the modded keggers the guys had for sale on here?
 
Reply
Old May 4, 2008 | 11:35 PM
  #50  
ripto's Avatar
ripto
Thread Starter
|
Captain
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default RE: 4.10 gears vs. 265 tires

Back on this subject, is there any way my mpg could go down considering I don't change my driving style? Would I have to do like 100% highway to see a decrease in mpg?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 PM.