2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

fastman vs. holley

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-03-2008, 12:32 AM
grizzlyfarmer2's Avatar
grizzlyfarmer2
grizzlyfarmer2 is offline
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default fastman vs. holley

so tell me folks why does nobody go with the holley. i woudl guess price but is there a difference in performance?
 
  #2  
Old 08-03-2008, 04:04 AM
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
jasonw is offline
Site Moderator
Dodge Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 12 Posts
Default RE: fastman vs. holley

The Holley might be manufactured straight out of a factory, as the Fastmans are bored out stock units, but they do the same thing. Pay twice as much money for the name if they do the same thing? No thanks.
 
  #3  
Old 08-03-2008, 10:36 AM
xskylinedx's Avatar
xskylinedx
xskylinedx is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: fastman vs. holley

I don't know from experience but I'm confident there is no performance difference between the two. You can take the saved money and put it tword another upgrade. Plus IIRC the stock unit is a holley.
 
  #4  
Old 08-03-2008, 05:10 PM
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
jasonw is offline
Site Moderator
Dodge Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 12 Posts
Default RE: fastman vs. holley

Yep, you are correct, the stock unit is made by Holley.
 
  #5  
Old 08-03-2008, 09:29 PM
talon6's Avatar
talon6
talon6 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: fastman vs. holley

installed my fastman 52mmtoday. nice upgrade.a definite improvement in the mid and higher rpms.
he does nice machining. and a very helpful guy too.i liked calling him and he said that he had to make it first. that just made me feel better everything was on a more personal level. plus the price is nice too.
 
  #6  
Old 08-05-2008, 12:54 AM
hometheaterman's Avatar
hometheaterman
hometheaterman is offline
Champion
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I think the cheap price of The Fastman is what makes most people go with it.
 
  #7  
Old 08-06-2008, 07:40 AM
HankL's Avatar
HankL
HankL is offline
Champion
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,313
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default



The above flows for the factory throttle bodies designed by Chrysler and manufactured by Holley are from the USA Patent
and are 'sworn under oath to be true'

The numbers on graphs are not the mm sizes, but the number of the line that describes that throttle body in the patent.

Line 58 {correction} is the one for the 5.2/5.9 factory throttle body design
and since it has two bores
you need to double the CFM number
so that the stock Dodge 5.2/5.9 dual bore throttle body flows about
600 CFM

If you understand the graph
you understand that simply boring out the throttle body 'venturi'
... the smaller section....
does not increase flow at maximum opening
but does give a 'jumpy' feel to the throttle as you begin to open it.

Full Patent at

http://tinyurl.com/59ug6o
 

Last edited by HankL; 08-07-2008 at 06:28 AM.
  #8  
Old 08-06-2008, 08:09 AM
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
aim4squirrels is offline
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

HankL,

Welcome back! I see by reading your link that plot line 50 is a straight bored 52mm. Plot line 52 is a 42mm bored TB and the others are various manipulations of the "nozzled" T design where they altered the taper and blade clearance. Am I reading that correctly?
 
  #9  
Old 08-06-2008, 10:48 AM
talon6's Avatar
talon6
talon6 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

that may be what the graph says but i disagree. i am a big sceptic on everything,but i am telling you that i could feel a difference after the install.
 
  #10  
Old 08-06-2008, 03:18 PM
steve05ram360's Avatar
steve05ram360
steve05ram360 is offline
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,827
Received 235 Likes on 218 Posts
Default

the 52mm on a 5.9 is an awesome upgrade... when I sold mine & went back to stock I started looking for something I did wrong (stock TB & stock rockers from the 1.7's and gibson shorties) after double checking I could not find any issue... just missing the parts & power.
 


Quick Reply: fastman vs. holley



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 AM.