2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

weird pinging issues...need help.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 04:21 PM
  #101  
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
Site Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 28
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default

Glad you got it sorted out squirrels, and glad you like your Canon. I have the SX100IS and love it as well.

Not to thread jack, but I have a semi-related question... I recently acquired an intake manifold thats had the runners cut down and everything for me. It is from a 1999 Dodge Ram, so with that PCV comment you made earlier, are you telling me it won't work in my 2001? The guy who sold the thing to me told me it'd work in any Ram made 1998 and newer.

Thanks in advance, and Happy Thanksgiving to you too.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 06:33 AM
  #102  
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
Thread Starter
|
Legend
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 13
From: DFW, Texas
Default

It might work, but the vac accessory port may be on the wrong side as well. I didn't want to chance it, and didn't bother asking to see it. You can run a longer tube to get the PCV to the other side, hell you might even be able to switch valve covers. I dunno about that, never tried it. I would be a little concerned that running a tube that could potentially fill with oil might cause premature PCV failures over and over. I would think that the longer the hose and the more bending it has to do, the more likely that may become.

With the price they were trying to stick on me, I was interested in going that route anyway. The 1999 may still be the same, but I know they switched late in the 2nd generation models, just not 100% sure where exactly. Probably when they ran out of the old intakes. I know my truck uses O2 sensors from the 2002 5.9 Ram. They must have run thru all the round plug connectors.

And then there's the one last reason:

I "might" have been fishing for a reason to get a performance intake.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 07:22 AM
  #103  
zman17's Avatar
zman17
Retired Moderator - RIP
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 17
From: NH
Default

Isn't $555 kind of high? Summit has them for $296 natural finish. Unless it's a polished finish one. Might look nicer, but geez.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 07:29 AM
  #104  
HankL's Avatar
HankL
Champion
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,313
Likes: 8
Default

the pictures are well done
and have impressive depth of focus

if a Canon SD500 compact camera does that well it is worth a look
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 11:45 AM
  #105  
talon6's Avatar
talon6
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 2
From: ohio
Default

canon's take some awesome pics. i have the canon rebel eos xti rebel.

with the new intake you are getting, are the ponies going to be in the upper rpm range?

i donnt seem to have a problems in the upper rpms. its the lower rpms i am lacking.thats why i ask.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 11:53 AM
  #106  
zman17's Avatar
zman17
Retired Moderator - RIP
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 17
From: NH
Default

That manifold is gonna bump the power band up 1000 rpm. So the bottom end is going to be lost.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 12:47 PM
  #107  
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
Thread Starter
|
Legend
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 13
From: DFW, Texas
Default

Nah, the 4.10 gears and 1.7 rr will more than compensate for that. besides I believe it's just the performer, not the performer RPM he's sending me. Maybe I'll get even luckier than I thought.

That one you see on summit's site for $300 is a dual plane, not a single plane and it's for carbed applications (no FI ports). That's why the big difference in price.

I effectively moved the powerband up anyway when I cut the runners, I doubt I'll see anything but improved performance across the board but I promise to remain objective when I report after I install it.

It might be "cause" for some upgraded heads though....
 

Last edited by aim4squirrels; Nov 28, 2008 at 12:57 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 01:21 PM
  #108  
talon6's Avatar
talon6
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 2
From: ohio
Default

10-4.

i need to get those HS rr orderd. i donnt know why i keep putting it off. i have read on other forums,not just here,how good they are.i have reseached them well.and i think its the mod that i am looking for.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 01:25 PM
  #109  
zman17's Avatar
zman17
Retired Moderator - RIP
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 17
From: NH
Default

Aim? What 1.7's are you using?
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 03:02 PM
  #110  
talon6's Avatar
talon6
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 2
From: ohio
Default

more than likely harland sharp rr.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 PM.