2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

94 magnum 3.9L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 11:14 PM
  #1  
Fain's Avatar
Fain
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default 94 magnum 3.9L

i currently drive a ram 1500 single cab, long wheel base. I get 12 mpg average, and flooring it isnt much different than having my foot about halfway down on the gas pedal. So i was wondering what would be more cost effective; supercharging it, or replacing the engine with a 5.4L V8 magnum?
i know that i would need a new transmission with the new engine, but if someone could tell me what else i need that would be awesome. I haven't the slightest clue about anything to do with supercharging it, i just ran into the possibility of it while researching an engine swap. So, my questions are what would supercharging my truck do to the horsepower and fuel economy, as well as how much it would run me, and what all would i have to replace to put the V8 magnum into it.

P.S. I can get an engine for around $500-600 from our local mechanic, as well as get other parts relatively cheap.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 11:20 PM
  #2  
WTL's Avatar
WTL
Professional
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From:
Default

You might need a new computer with the engine.
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 10:01 AM
  #3  
audiomechanic's Avatar
audiomechanic
Captain
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From:
Default

IIRC, you'll need a different tranny too along with the computer.
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 01:02 PM
  #4  
Fain's Avatar
Fain
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

I talked to my brother about it, and he said i would also need to replace my exhaust system, is that true?
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 01:09 PM
  #5  
Jimmeh's Avatar
Jimmeh
Professional
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Columbia Falls, Montana
Default

Most likely. You could probably get away with the tail pipe, but I imagine you'll be replacing the catalytic converter.

And are you thinking 5.2 liter (318) or 5.9 liter (360)?
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 01:10 PM
  #6  
Fain's Avatar
Fain
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

the 318, my mistake i thought they were 5.4L not 5.2.
i have read that the v6 magnums were essentially the 318s wit htwo cylinders lopped off so i figures that would be simpler than a 360
 

Last edited by Fain; Dec 27, 2008 at 01:17 PM.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 PM.