2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

To whom it may concern: Chrysler 5.2 vs gm 5.3!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 02:47 AM
  #1  
360dodgeram360's Avatar
360dodgeram360
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Default To whom it may concern: Chrysler 5.2 vs gm 5.3!

There has been some debate about the performance of the 5.3 gm engine and the magnums. I thought that i could possibly clear up some misconceptions through my experiences. I know a couple friends with silverado 5.3's. Last night i raced a buddy with a 2001 silverado z71 5.3l with dual exhaust and cold air intake in my 95 dodge ram 5-speed 5.2 with cold air and exhaust. we raced twice from 0-60 and i won by around a truck length. then we raced three times from 60-100 and i consistently pulled ahead by around a truck length or more. both trucks had same mods and both trucks weighed around the same because i had sand bags and a passenger in my truck and the chevy did not (accounting for 4x4 difference) also chevy's are lighter trucks to begin with. Anyway i was tired of hearing this rubbish about how the 5.3s are so much better can outperform magnums so i really put it to the test.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 04:40 AM
  #2  
talon6's Avatar
talon6
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 2
From: ohio
Default

been there, done that.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 07:08 AM
  #3  
Vader's Avatar
Vader
Champion
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,740
Likes: 0
From: Death Star
Default

It feels like my 5.2 4x4 could not beat a scooter.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 08:49 AM
  #4  
Gary-L's Avatar
Gary-L
Legend
Veteran: Navy
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 8
From: Central Oklahoma
Default

I don't look at how fast the engine can power the truck, but rather durability. Chrysler's 5.2L engines (past and present) are bullet proof. Mine has a rear main leak and I've literally driven with 1.5 quarts of oil in the pan. My truck has literally been so hot that the temp needle was going to push the radio before I shut off the engine. The high amount of nickel in those engines is what makes them indestructible. Chevy can't match that.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 11:46 AM
  #5  
audiomechanic's Avatar
audiomechanic
Captain
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From:
Default

Was his a stick also? If not, I bet your transmission had more to do with your win than your engine. Auto trannies FTL.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 11:52 AM
  #6  
Bob5151's Avatar
Bob5151
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 487
Likes: 5
From: Philadelphia, PA
Default

Originally Posted by audiomechanic
Was his a stick also? If not, I bet your transmission had more to do with your win than your engine. Auto trannies FTL.
i think the reason the 5.2L feels sluggish to many is because of the weak auto transmission. It's not only unreliable, but you probably experience a lot of power loss through it too. Ask people with a 5.2 and a 5-speed, and many say their truck feels downright peppy.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 12:42 PM
  #7  
zman17's Avatar
zman17
Retired Moderator - RIP
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 17
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by Bob5151
i think the reason the 5.2L feels sluggish to many is because of the weak auto transmission. It's not only unreliable, but you probably experience a lot of power loss through it too. Ask people with a 5.2 and a 5-speed, and many say their truck feels downright peppy.


How does yours feel with the 285's on it? I have 3:55's also but with 265's right now. Just curious, because I want to put on 285's when these tires are all done.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 12:56 PM
  #8  
Vader's Avatar
Vader
Champion
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,740
Likes: 0
From: Death Star
Default

I have 285's w/3.55

Here is your answer, I am shopping for 4.11s
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 12:58 PM
  #9  
07gixxer600's Avatar
07gixxer600
Rookie
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Default

5.2 < 5.3

imo
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 01:02 PM
  #10  
zman17's Avatar
zman17
Retired Moderator - RIP
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 17
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by Vader
I have 285's w/3.55

Here is your answer, I am shopping for 4.11s
That's what I figured, I'm happy now with the 265's along with all the mods I've done. Maybe I'll just stay with that size. Sorry for the thread jack.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:10 PM.