2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

towing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 10:37 PM
  #31  
95MaroonMonster's Avatar
95MaroonMonster
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

that would make me horny b/c it would make a cummins swap easy
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 10:43 PM
  #32  
Cereal Killer's Avatar
Cereal Killer
Champion
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 5
From:
Default

I guess we should just be thankful we have solid axels. The 3rd and 4th gen 1500s have independent front suspension, and the 4th gens have coil springs in the rear... Chevys even have independent front suspensions in their Heavy dutys...

Scary isn't it?
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 10:47 PM
  #33  
dodge15004x45.9's Avatar
dodge15004x45.9
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,950
Likes: 2
From: Malvern Pa - Canadensis Pa
Default

sorry i'm to young to see why.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 11:15 PM
  #34  
PurplDodge's Avatar
PurplDodge
Legend
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,321
Likes: 12
From: Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by Cereal Killer
The engine, transmission, and transfercase (in the 4x4) are all identical. Wouldn't it have been nice if they'd have just put Dana 60s in the 1500, and not bothered with a V8 option in the 2500s?
Because they had to make a truck for people like 01DodgeRam360. lol
 

Last edited by PurplDodge; Mar 25, 2009 at 11:21 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 11:19 PM
  #35  
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
Site Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 28
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default

Originally Posted by PurplDodge
Because they had to make a truck for people like 01DodgeRam360. lol
Now now, don't stir the pot young one, don't stir the pot...
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 11:21 PM
  #36  
PurplDodge's Avatar
PurplDodge
Legend
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,321
Likes: 12
From: Indiana
Default

Sorry....But when I have something to say, I SAY IT!!!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 11:26 PM
  #37  
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
Site Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 28
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default

No need to apologize, just trying to warn you all the while knowing you will ignore my warning.

BTW, thanks for adding that "I have AD/HD" to your sig. Now new guys will understand.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 11:28 PM
  #38  
PurplDodge's Avatar
PurplDodge
Legend
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,321
Likes: 12
From: Indiana
Default

That is "Incase you havent noticed".
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 01:52 AM
  #39  
TMS Bill's Avatar
TMS Bill
Record Breaker
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 1
From: Warren, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Cereal Killer
Yeah the only difference between the 1500, and 2500 with the 5.9 is the Dana 60 rear end (front end too in the 4x4). It even has the same 2.5" wide leafs as the 1500s. The V-10 and cummins got 3" wide leaf springs. oh and the lift blocks in the 2500s are about 2" taller.

The engine, transmission, and transfercase (in the 4x4) are all identical. Wouldn't it have been nice if they'd have just put Dana 60s in the 1500, and not bothered with a V8 option in the 2500s?
The 1500 has a 9" frame ... the 2500/3500 has a 12" frame.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 02:04 AM
  #40  
Cereal Killer's Avatar
Cereal Killer
Champion
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 5
From:
Default

Is that fact? I've heard that before, and it seems logical, but then I've also been told the frames are the same size. I've never actually been under a 2500 to see if that's the deal or not.

I still think it would have been sweet for 1500s to have Dana 60s front and back.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:07 PM.