2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Ditching the 180*

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 09:50 AM
  #21  
steve05ram360's Avatar
steve05ram360
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,944
Likes: 308
Default

The o2 sensor fuse was in the fuse box.

it sounds like you guys are making too big a deal out of the 180* t-stat... it is not. all it does is open sooner and opens to full flow sooner than a 195* t-stat. you will not throw a code and you will not have any adverse affects from the swap. DC puts a 195 stat in there for emissions purposes... a hotter motor runs cleaner at the sacrafice of performance...
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 02:34 PM
  #22  
rafter40's Avatar
rafter40
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Default

Well i replaced mine with a 195 and the engine runs significantly below its old opperating temp. Before i only used strait coolant in the radiator but now its got around a 60% 40 % coolant to water ratio. i dont know if this would cause the change in temp but should i worry about anything with the cooler temp? i havent noticed any performance difference.
My truck has a sputtering problem occasionally and it seems to be occuring more frequently not that i changed the thermostat but that could just be a coincidence
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 08:24 PM
  #23  
dodge15004x45.9's Avatar
dodge15004x45.9
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,950
Likes: 2
From: Malvern Pa - Canadensis Pa
Default

I have to flush the rad and was going to put a 180 in now i'm not sure.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 10:19 PM
  #24  
Gary-L's Avatar
Gary-L
Legend
Veteran: Navy
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 8
From: Central Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by rafter40
Well i replaced mine with a 195 and the engine runs significantly below its old opperating temp. Before i only used strait coolant in the radiator but now its got around a 60% 40 % coolant to water ratio. i dont know if this would cause the change in temp but should i worry about anything with the cooler temp? i havent noticed any performance difference.
My truck has a sputtering problem occasionally and it seems to be occuring more frequently not that i changed the thermostat but that could just be a coincidence
Straight coolant is a great way to damage your engine and cooling system.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 11:29 PM
  #25  
el_oso's Avatar
el_oso
Professional
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by steve05ram360
The o2 sensor fuse was in the fuse box.

it sounds like you guys are making too big a deal out of the 180* t-stat... it is not. all it does is open sooner and opens to full flow sooner than a 195* t-stat. you will not throw a code and you will not have any adverse affects from the swap. DC puts a 195 stat in there for emissions purposes... a hotter motor runs cleaner at the sacrafice of performance...
Sorry, but I beg to differ bro.

After I installed the 180 I kept throwing a code, each time related to the t-stat, in winter. 3 X $25 a read and it was gone.
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 06:31 AM
  #26  
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
Site Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 28
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default

I've read in warmer climates like Texas, southern Cali, Florida, etc., the 180 t-stat works just fine. However, up here in the midwest and other places where we have pretty cold winters (and other places that have even colder winters), the 180s sometimes cause CELs. Don't think I actually have heard of any real problems related to the t-stat other than the CEL, though.
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 10:10 AM
  #27  
Acapalic's Avatar
Acapalic
Professional
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 143
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

my 160 hasnt given me any problems other than being stuck in open loop, No CEL`s no nothing. And ive ran this for a year now , through the cold winter.
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #28  
sungod's Avatar
sungod
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 389
Likes: 1
From: Fairfax VA
Default

I still haven't got an answer that makes any sense what the benefit is of running a 180 degree t-stat. It seems to me the risk of carbon build up and poor combustion from the lower temps would be more of a risk than any gains you would get.
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 10:48 AM
  #29  
mcss8541's Avatar
mcss8541
All Star
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 946
Likes: 1
From: EL CAMPO, TX
Default

Originally Posted by jasonw
I've read in warmer climates like Texas, southern Cali, Florida, etc., the 180 t-stat works just fine. However, up here in the midwest and other places where we have pretty cold winters (and other places that have even colder winters), the 180s sometimes cause CELs. Don't think I actually have heard of any real problems related to the t-stat other than the CEL, though.
I'm in Southwes Texas and have no issues with mine; however it may be different up there where you boys are with all the snow and stuff.
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 11:17 AM
  #30  
julianvdmeer's Avatar
julianvdmeer
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 56
Likes: 1
From: The netherlands
Default

I installed the 180 T stat two weeks ago, and i drive about 400 miles a week, the truck runs better with this T stat and there is no difference in mpg, so i love it so far, no worries of over heating just drive the truck and last week i was in a big traffic mess so i had to drive 2 miles per hour for about 15 miles, and the truck stays at 180.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 PM.