2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

BFG vs. Toyo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 02:33 AM
  #11  
chromed95's Avatar
chromed95
Thread Starter
|
Captain
15 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 607
Likes: 1
From: Washington
Default

thanks everyone for the info! I've been thinking about it all day and at this moment i'm leaning towards the toyos. i figure what have i got to lose since a lot of people are saying good things about them and whats a couple extra benjamins? but thats not a set in stone decision. i do like the idea of going to 70 instead of 75. will that still work fine as far as turning radius? are 70's heavier than 75's or the same? or will it rub? i'm guessing it won't rub but just checking. thanks again guys!
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 02:42 AM
  #12  
dodge15004x45.9's Avatar
dodge15004x45.9
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,950
Likes: 2
From: Malvern Pa - Canadensis Pa
Default

Dude u can fit 35's under tht truck w a 2" lift!
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 03:10 AM
  #13  
helms's Avatar
helms
All Star
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
From: Langley, BC, Canada
Default

olyelr is right. I think him and I have argued with other people about this before.

In metric tire sizes the (eg. LT285/75R16) the LT stands for light truck, 285 is the WIDTH, in millimeters, of the mounted and inflated tire, sidewall to sidewall. the 75 is the "aspect ratio", it is the height of the sidewall in a percentage to the width of the tire. in this case, the sidewall is 75% of 285mm tall, 213.75mm.

if you were to get a 70 instead, then the tire would be shorter by 5%, but have no effect on the width.
 

Last edited by helms; Jul 9, 2009 at 03:12 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 03:38 AM
  #14  
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
Site Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 28
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default

Helms is correct. The first number is the metric measurement (mm) in width of the tire. All the next number is, whether its 70, 75, or whatever, is the percentage of the width that the tire height is. 70% of 285 would be 199.5 mm tall. 75% would be 213.75 mm tall.

Therefore, 70 is no wider than 75. It might give off that appearance, because its a not as tall, but its actually no wider.
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 08:57 AM
  #15  
macplee's Avatar
macplee
Rookie
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Default

These are the Toyo you are considering. Just got them a month or two ago. Love it so far.
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 11:05 AM
  #16  
Sheriff420's Avatar
Sheriff420
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,055
Likes: 7
From: Lee County, North Carolina
Default

i used to have a set of the bfgs 285 70 17 and i loved them, beat the hell out of them and rode for about a year with a roofing nail in each front tire and the only reason i took them off is because they were on the wear bars. the last time i went to oklahoma a bull got out and i was in my truck coaxing him back to his pasture and every time i went from one side of the road to the other i bet i popped 5 or 6 bottles and didn't have a mark on the tires.

heres a good site that all of ya'll ought to check out.

http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 11:26 AM
  #17  
Ram15002ndGen's Avatar
Ram15002ndGen
Record Breaker
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Default

To the OP, I would suggest going to a tire place and tell the guy to pull down the tire size you want to run. Tell him to pull one 75 and one 70 and you make the decision based upon what your eye ***** tell you. Don't worry about what anyone else says. I made my decision and have never regretted it. As to your question about rubbing, you will have no trouble at all.
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 11:51 AM
  #18  
Sheriff420's Avatar
Sheriff420
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,055
Likes: 7
From: Lee County, North Carolina
Default

the link i just put up is a tire size calculator that'll show the difference with a picture. check it out.

and i believe that 265 75 16 was a factory option for the 4x4s, they'll fit with some room left over.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:36 PM.