2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

5.2 vs 5.9 GAS Transmission difference

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2010 | 11:04 PM
  #21  
Me112233's Avatar
Me112233
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Franklin, KY
Default ok, so what is the difference?

When I look up prices for the 2WD transmissions at Dodge dealer web sites, there is a very different price between transmissions for the 5.2 and 5.9 (gas) prices. Not meaning any disrespect, but can anyone answer the question at hand (and not go off on tangents on related issues) and explain the difference between the two transmissions, which are both listed as 46RE transmission.
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2010 | 11:23 PM
  #22  
GeorgiaDodge's Avatar
GeorgiaDodge
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: North Georgia
Default

I know Montec can answer your question, might want to hit him up
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2010 | 01:30 AM
  #23  
yakkier's Avatar
yakkier
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 1
From: Burnsville, mn - Pensacola, fl
Default

I would think that the 5.9 would have a beefier internals in the transmission vs the 5.2 due to the added torque you get with the 360.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2010 | 01:38 AM
  #24  
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
Site Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 28
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default

Nope. Should be same exact transmissions. Perhaps they screwed up, and listed a 4x4 tranny?
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2010 | 02:02 AM
  #25  
J415's Avatar
J415
Champion
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 4
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

The only difference I can think of is the torque converters on the 5.2's are not weighted and the 5.9's are weighted. There not interchangeable. Other then that,it's the same. Ask for the build sheet for the 5.2 and the 5.9 then you'll know the difference. What's the price difference? Can you give us the link so we can check it out?
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2010 | 08:48 AM
  #26  
MonteC's Avatar
MonteC
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 2
From: North Charleston, SC
Default

The price difference like J said is most likely due to the different torque converter. They have different stall speeds and may be weighted a little different. Everything inside those two transmissions is completely identical. They are the same.

If the price difference is not due to the converter than it is due to the bad dealership taking advantage of peoples ignorance. Which many have done for many years.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2010 | 12:53 PM
  #27  
Gerehead8's Avatar
Gerehead8
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 1
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by J415
The only difference I can think of is the torque converters on the 5.2's are not weighted and the 5.9's are weighted. There not interchangeable. Other then that,it's the same. Ask for the build sheet for the 5.2 and the 5.9 then you'll know the difference. What's the price difference? Can you give us the link so we can check it out?
The converter is not weighted in the 46RE's, the flexplate is.

To the rest of the thread:
I have never seen a 4x4 V6 and I read somewhere that the 5.2L was the smallest engine allowed in the 4x4s.

I have never seen an A727 (36RH) in a 2nd gen from the factory but my service manual for a 1994 has the 32RH, 36RH, and 37RH rebuild instructions along with the 42RH, 46RH, and 47RH. I have the 46RH in my 1994 truck FYI (it originally had a 5.2).
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2010 | 01:11 PM
  #28  
J415's Avatar
J415
Champion
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 4
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Gerehead8
The converter is not weighted in the 46RE's, the flexplate is.
Sorry but the torque converter IS weighted on 5.9's There are weights welded on the back of th converter because the 5.9's are externally balanced.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2010 | 02:16 PM
  #29  
Gerehead8's Avatar
Gerehead8
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 1
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by J415
Sorry but the torque converter IS weighted on 5.9's There are weights welded on the back of th converter because the 5.9's are externally balanced.
Let me clarify:

The 1994-95 46RH trannies behind the 5.9L had one large weight welded to the front of the converter for the external balance.

In 1996 with the 46RE trannies and the 5.9L dodge moved the weights to the flexplate and had a neutrally balanced torque converter.

The 5.2L is internally balanced and has always had a neutral balanced flexplate and torque converter.

There are small weights often welded to the torque converter to balance it but these are not the 5.9L balance weights.
 
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 12:53 AM
  #30  
Me112233's Avatar
Me112233
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Franklin, KY
Default link where I found the prices

Originally Posted by J415
The only difference I can think of is the torque converters on the 5.2's are not weighted and the 5.9's are weighted. There not interchangeable. Other then that,it's the same. Ask for the build sheet for the 5.2 and the 5.9 then you'll know the difference. What's the price difference? Can you give us the link so we can check it out?
Here is the link. You may have to input information (Dodge, 1998, Ram 1500, automatic transmission). http://www.chryslerpartscenter.com/p...layCatalogid=0
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 PM.