2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

top end rebuild

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2009 | 11:09 PM
  #1  
millertime 1321's Avatar
millertime 1321
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: sunny san diego
Default top end rebuild

hey fellas. i just bought me a hughes fi airgap intake manifold. its part of a step by step top end rebuild. i eventually plan on replacing the cam, getting iron ram heads with 2.02 valves, sturdier springs, roller rockers, and hardened pushrods. now heres my question. does anyone know anything about hughes shaft mount roller rockers for our magnum motors. theyre 1.65:1 ratio so they wouldnt increase the cam profile as much, but are they sturdier with the shaft? or do they create less friction? or should i just stick with the harland sharps?
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 12:24 AM
  #2  
lastrights's Avatar
lastrights
Grand Champion
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,849
Likes: 5
From: the burgh
Default

i would say harland sharps adj. 1.6
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 01:21 PM
  #3  
millertime 1321's Avatar
millertime 1321
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: sunny san diego
Default

i was thinkin along the lines of the 1.7 non adjust rr's. i think thats what most people have on this forum and they say they love em.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 01:30 PM
  #4  
lastrights's Avatar
lastrights
Grand Champion
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,849
Likes: 5
From: the burgh
Default

yeah but if your planning on a cam thee 1,7 not a good idea, the point of the 1.7 is a cheaper way to get power without doing all the work for a cam
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 04:23 PM
  #5  
millertime 1321's Avatar
millertime 1321
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: sunny san diego
Default

true. that was part of the reason i was considering the 1.65 shaft mounts from hughes, i thought they might facilitate a cam swap better
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 05:23 PM
  #6  
AlabamaRam95's Avatar
AlabamaRam95
All Star
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

what cam are you going with? trying to figure out what rocker arm you want is kind of a mute point until you know what valve/lobe lift you want.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 11:05 PM
  #7  
millertime 1321's Avatar
millertime 1321
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: sunny san diego
Default

well i was gonna go with a hughes cam, if i got one at all. alot of the guys on here are happy with their higher ratio roller rockers and i figured if i was happy with the way those wroked out i might leave off the cam swap for the far away future when im buildin a serious racing machine, but for now a cam swap would only happen after all the other upgrades and only if i was still looking for a little better performance.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 AM.