2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

1998 Dodge VS 2000 Chevy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2009 | 12:27 AM
  #21  
cmckenna's Avatar
cmckenna
Record Breaker
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 6
From: Near NY for another contract
Default

Actually, there's no issues with newer designed Al heads at all and, in fact, they are much preferred over cast iron. The whole coefficient of expansion rate issue has been designed out and, they are now made out of heat treated T-6 Al and are thermally tested, load tested, road tested, thermally cycled and prove to pass all environmental tests better than cast iron.

Cast iron fatigues after a period of time, and depending on where the castings are made, (mexican dodge heads that were total garbage) they may not be worth 30K miles before cracking.

So, todays Al heads are not an issue and surpass cast iron so long as they are made by a reputable outfit.
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2009 | 12:40 AM
  #22  
95MaroonMonster's Avatar
95MaroonMonster
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

still, i'm old skool

that and i like the clatter of the old 7.3s and 5.9s
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2009 | 10:03 AM
  #23  
Weldor's Avatar
Weldor
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: London Ontario
Default

I'm shocked no one has talked about the almost $4000 price difference. If I was only using the truck a few times a year to tow and once in awhile for bad weather, I'd go with the dodge just on price alone, if its been taken care of.
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2009 | 10:28 AM
  #24  
Augiedoggy's Avatar
Augiedoggy
Champion
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 8
From: Western NY,
Default

Originally Posted by Weldor
I'm shocked no one has talked about the almost $4000 price difference. If I was only using the truck a few times a year to tow and once in awhile for bad weather, I'd go with the dodge just on price alone, if its been taken care of.
true but judging by the fact that he is considering both it kinda states the $4grand is considered as well as the fact that its 30k ans 2 years newer...and if it gets closer to 20k in mpg the 4G could pay for itself over the years anyway....gas adds up quick...
Maroon I understand what your saying but we are comparing these two trucks not the diesel or ford and the 6.0 is a better engine than the magnum5.9. Sorry but to say otherwise is like argueing a 20dollar bill is better than a 50 just because its what you got.. the numbers dont lie....the hemi is a different story but again we arent comparing them.
 

Last edited by Augiedoggy; Dec 31, 2009 at 10:31 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2009 | 12:21 PM
  #25  
koester9911's Avatar
koester9911
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

[quote=koester9911;1928337]


Hi Everyone, WOW, thanks for all the feedback. We actually had a call from a dealership this morning that I had stopped in 5 months ago and the owner asked me if I'd ever bought anything. He took in a 2001 Dodge 2500 4X4 V10 Automatic with only 84K miles last night that he's serviced since new. It's a plain Jane base model but he told me if I wanted it I could have it for $7,400.00 Any comments would be appreciated, Since the 2001 is 3 yrs newer and has half the miles and a V10, I'm assuming it's a much better choice for the extra $900.
The Chevy dealer isn't willing to budge on the $10K for the 2000. I've herd a lot of comments on the Dodge Tranny issues. Did the 2001's also have issues and even if I had to put 2K into a new tranny for the Dodge, wouldn't I have a similar or better truck for about the same cost as the Chevy given the Dodge has the V10 and is a year newer? Thanks again everyone!
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2009 | 12:54 PM
  #26  
koester9911's Avatar
koester9911
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default Yea

Originally Posted by Weldor
I'm shocked no one has talked about the almost $4000 price difference. If I was only using the truck a few times a year to tow and once in awhile for bad weather, I'd go with the dodge just on price alone, if its been taken care of.
I was kinda surprised no one has mentioned the price difference as well. The Dodge dealer has dropped the price to $5,500.00 It's now a $4500 difference. The Chevy dealer won't budge on price. I spoke to one of the mechanics at the Chevy dealer and he told me they have a lot of money into the Chevy. He told me they had to replace the brake and fuel lines as well as a new 4X4 computer controller or something like that. He said it was a $1400 repair for most people. He said they also replaced all 4 brakes and rotors.
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2009 | 01:00 PM
  #27  
Augiedoggy's Avatar
Augiedoggy
Champion
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 8
From: Western NY,
Default

Originally Posted by koester9911
I was kinda surprised no one has mentioned the price difference as well. The Dodge dealer has dropped the price to $5,500.00 It's now a $4500 difference. The Chevy dealer won't budge on price. I spoke to one of the mechanics at the Chevy dealer and he told me they have a lot of money into the Chevy. He told me they had to replace the brake and fuel lines as well as a new 4X4 computer controller or something like that. He said it was a $1400 repair for most people. He said they also replaced all 4 brakes and rotors.
the 4x4 system kinda sucks on the chevy and the bracks are pricey to rebuild...(a friend on mine has a 99) ....another has an 02 and had multiple issues with the 4x4 system ...I say get the v10 model...different tranny and no plenum issues...and built like a brick sh$thouse just save the dough for the gas....v10 usually only gets between 10-12 mpg from what most people say....then again I only get like 13 with my 5.9 and 4.56gears/35"tires so...
 

Last edited by Augiedoggy; Dec 31, 2009 at 01:03 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2009 | 01:05 PM
  #28  
Ram_It98's Avatar
Ram_It98
Professional
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Oakland City, IN
Default

you should get the 5.9 cummins thats what i want to get bad lol but you should get what makes you happy
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2009 | 04:59 PM
  #29  
95MaroonMonster's Avatar
95MaroonMonster
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by Augiedoggy
wo trucks not the diesel or ford and the 6.0 is a better engine than the magnum5.9. Sorry but to say otherwise is like argueing a 20dollar bill is better than a 50 just because its what you got.. the numbers dont lie....the hemi is a different story but again we arent comparing them.
yea, i know, i was just stating my position on the big 3

the 6.0 is indeed a fine engine, but to get it you have to settle for an independent front end (which truthfully is pretty weak)

the front end is the main reason i'd go with the dodge
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2009 | 06:39 PM
  #30  
johnjokela's Avatar
johnjokela
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Default

i'd probally keep looking if i was you, there are deals all the time, especially with the times nowadays, my next truck is going to be a hi boy mid 70's ford 4x4 with 390 motor , just like the body style for the older fords and its actual "metal" as with the interior is metal, dash, door panels etc...and always hear the 390 is a good motor, even though i hate fords, thats the only one i would own........still keeping the dodge tho!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 AM.