2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

What should the compression be?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2010 | 11:01 AM
  #11  
hometheaterman's Avatar
hometheaterman
Thread Starter
|
Champion
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 1
From:
Default

No the engine was cold when I did the test. Hadn't been started in a couple of days.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2010 | 11:07 AM
  #12  
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
Legend
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 13
From: DFW, Texas
Default

You should redo it on a warmed up engine and Ill bet you get a more accurate, tighter range.

Be careful not to burn yourself, use a kit with a long spark plug hole extension. I think Harbor freight had them on sale for Fathers day this week.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2010 | 11:29 AM
  #13  
hometheaterman's Avatar
hometheaterman
Thread Starter
|
Champion
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 1
From:
Default

The burning myself is why I didn't do it on a hot engine. Could my numbers be far enough off that I'd have a problem? Or am I fine since my numbers were pretty good on a cold engine? I've got long extensions, but I really hate to burn myself and I know it will happen on this thing if I try to do it when it's hot.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2010 | 11:39 AM
  #14  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,415
Likes: 4,214
From: Clayton MI
Default

Well, since there isn't really a problem, and the whole exercise was 'just out of curiosity' to begin with, I would look at your numbers, smile, and call it a day. There isn't really a need to take it any further.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 PM.