2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Turbo Or What ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-07-2010, 01:14 AM
dodgeram2001's Avatar
dodgeram2001
dodgeram2001 is offline
Professional
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston Texas.
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Turbo Or What ?

so has any one on here tried to turbo charged their ram let me know if its worth is or not what would be the way to go turbo or just get a new motor , all i have is the 318 with no mods so just throwing it out there ? so i have came across the turbo kit company called sts turbo kit http://www.ststurbo.com/ let me know what is the way to go if you have any ideas im sure someone has some.
 
  #2  
Old 09-07-2010, 01:19 AM
Salex007's Avatar
Salex007
Salex007 is offline
Captain
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

get the other mods taken care of first before turbo, like heads, cam, tuner, intake mainfold etc
 
  #3  
Old 09-07-2010, 03:07 AM
ColoradoRamLover's Avatar
ColoradoRamLover
ColoradoRamLover is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Look it up on youtube. Some guy did it in Arizona, it was pretty sick. From what I remember he put in a CTD radiator and what not.

If you do it, I gotta see a vid of you burnin some rubber! itll be saweet!
 
  #4  
Old 09-07-2010, 03:48 AM
Raine883's Avatar
Raine883
Raine883 is offline
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There whole site looks a little off to me, 2.3 lbs of boost? Rear mount turbos are a joke, They make no low end power, thats not something you want in a heavy truck. hel they make no torque on an ls1 until 5k rpms. http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te.../photo_16.html
 
  #5  
Old 09-07-2010, 10:13 AM
Sheriff420's Avatar
Sheriff420
Sheriff420 is offline
Grand Champion
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lee County, North Carolina
Posts: 7,055
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Turbo on a stock kegger is a bad idea. I don't know if a good plenum gasket can handle any boost but an airgap or m1 would be a good idea before adding a turbo.
 
  #6  
Old 09-07-2010, 10:16 AM
CPTAFW163's Avatar
CPTAFW163
CPTAFW163 is offline
Champion
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ft Campbell, KY/TN
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

you can run 6 lbs opf boost on a stock motor: Here is a good thread. 6-8 lbs of boost works well. He said he was not going to go 10 lbs of boost before welding the plate to the plenum.

http://www.bionicdodge.com/bionic/in...p?topic=9467.0
 
  #7  
Old 09-07-2010, 05:05 PM
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Hahns5.2 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Battle Ground WA
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Raine883
There whole site looks a little off to me, 2.3 lbs of boost? Rear mount turbos are a joke, They make no low end power, thats not something you want in a heavy truck. hel they make no torque on an ls1 until 5k rpms. http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te.../photo_16.html
Turbos aren't meant for low end power. ANY turbo that spools super low in the RPM range will choke the engine at high RPMs, I don't care if it's in the engine bay or a trailer behind the truck. Not to mention the high cylinder pressures (remember with a turbo you've got drive pressure as well) when you try forcing boost into an engine at low RPMs where it can't use the air. If you want low end power, you want a positive displacement blower. The whole idea of a turbo is that you retain perfect drivability until you punch it. Mine spools around 2k, plenty low enough and I can easily drive and stay out of boost and get the same fuel mileage as before.
 
  #8  
Old 09-07-2010, 07:58 PM
99Silver1500's Avatar
99Silver1500
99Silver1500 is offline
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Central Ky
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A turbo is a great option if you want performance and keep some fuel economy. the trick is to keep out of the turbo range while cruising around. I am not a fan of the under vehicle systems. the only advantage to them is to keep under hood temps down however they are terribly prone to picking up water even with snorkel kits. If you go this route a snorkel kit is a must IMHO. and triple check that it is tight or you are going to be buying a new engine. and no matter what they tell you a waste gate or a inter-cooler, will not remove water from the system. anyone who says that does not know what they are doing.


I second that I would not do this mod with a stock plenum... even with a huges I would keep your boost to 4lbs or under. I just dont trust the dang things to hold up to extended abuse of increased pressure.

Hahns sounds like you got a nice setup, any more info on yours?
 
  #9  
Old 09-07-2010, 08:30 PM
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Hahns5.2 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Battle Ground WA
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99Silver1500
A turbo is a great option if you want performance and keep some fuel economy. the trick is to keep out of the turbo range while cruising around. I am not a fan of the under vehicle systems. the only advantage to them is to keep under hood temps down however they are terribly prone to picking up water even with snorkel kits. If you go this route a snorkel kit is a must IMHO. and triple check that it is tight or you are going to be buying a new engine. and no matter what they tell you a waste gate or a inter-cooler, will not remove water from the system. anyone who says that does not know what they are doing.


I second that I would not do this mod with a stock plenum... even with a huges I would keep your boost to 4lbs or under. I just dont trust the dang things to hold up to extended abuse of increased pressure.

Hahns sounds like you got a nice setup, any more info on yours?
I've never heard of ANYONE picking up water with their remote kits. My filter stays bone dry driving around in the rain and it sits right on the turbo. You don't want to go bombing into huge puddles and rivers but rain is really a non-issue (other than traction problems )

With a Ram there is a large amount of space in front of the engine, I also have a lot of room under the hood of my truck but the AC lines ruin everything, not to mention there was MUCH less downtime building a remote setup, with an enigne bay setup you've gotta flip the manifolds and/or weld up a bunch of crossover tubing then try and snake a downpipe out of the engine bay, not really an option for me since it's my DD. Also the sound of the turbo when it's mounted out back with such a short downpipe is unreal.

I built everything myself using a Holset H1C with a 21cm housing (Like you would find on a 1st gen CTD). Currently at 4-5PSI, had it at 7PSI but I'm staying conservative till I get Megasquirt up and running so it's tuned properly, the FMU runs out of fuel much past 4k.

The stock Bottom end will hold up to a lot with a good tune. Duner has been running 15PSI and an estimated 600-650HP on his stock bottom end 5.9 for years now, going 10s in his Dakota.

 

Last edited by Hahns5.2; 09-07-2010 at 08:38 PM.
  #10  
Old 09-07-2010, 09:11 PM
dodgeram2001's Avatar
dodgeram2001
dodgeram2001 is offline
Professional
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston Texas.
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If i did the turbo i wouldnt put it under the truck i would build a box behind the cab and put stacks on my truck so if i would go in the mud and water it wouldnt suck up water and crap so that would be cool ?
 


Quick Reply: Turbo Or What ?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 AM.