2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

New truck, 5.2 or 5.9?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 07:26 PM
  #1  
Gaius's Avatar
Gaius
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: Beaverton, OR
Default New truck, 5.2 or 5.9?

I'm picking up a 98 5.2/5speed 4x4 with 160k on it for real cheap.

Now, I'm not specifically buying this as a tow rig (because it's so cheap) but wouldn't mind if it worked out pulling towing duty once or twice a year on longer trips (600-1200 miles one way). Probably flat tow, but I could easily borrow a trailer. Jeep is 4200 pounds.

I have a 98 Wrangler TJ with a 5.9/46RE in it. I've been wanting to swap in a 5.2 into it anyways, because I'm only getting 10 mpg and the power was less than I had expected.

Question is, if I were to swap the 5.2 and 5.9 around (not swap trannies), would the 5.9 tow considerably better than the 5.2? And would the 5.2 get a little better mileage than the 5.9? Or would I be splitting hairs?

Any input would be appreciated!
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 07:29 PM
  #2  
TheBigRedOne's Avatar
TheBigRedOne
Registered User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: The Box
Default

5.2 baby. Every Chrysler 318 I've had (and I've had 7 now) has run for a long, long time.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 07:40 PM
  #3  
CBR900RR19's Avatar
CBR900RR19
Professional
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

If they have run for a Loooooooong Looooooooong time why have you had 7?? Just messin LOL

Originally Posted by TheBigRedOne
5.2 baby. Every Chrysler 318 I've had (and I've had 7 now) has run for a long, long time.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 07:49 PM
  #4  
TheBigRedOne's Avatar
TheBigRedOne
Registered User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: The Box
Default

Because I trashed the rest of the truck!
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 07:57 PM
  #5  
Gaius's Avatar
Gaius
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: Beaverton, OR
Default

No too worried about which will last linger. I mean, they're almost the same engine.

More looking for comments on power and fuel (un)economy.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 07:58 PM
  #6  
CBR900RR19's Avatar
CBR900RR19
Professional
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

Remind me never!! Did I say never to let you borrow my keys LOL!!!

Originally Posted by TheBigRedOne
Because I trashed the rest of the truck!
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 08:26 PM
  #7  
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 3
From: Battle Ground WA
Default

The 5.9 makes a decent amount more of low end torque, but keep in mine the NV3500 tranny behind your 5.2 wasn't put the behind the 5.9, it'll probably be fine but it's worth noting (I'm running somewhere around 350HP through my NV3500). You can't swap the flywheel/flex plates on the 5.2 and 5.9 due to balancing issues so be sure to get the correct ones for your swap.

Fuel mileage will be comparable between the 2 in a Ram.
 

Last edited by Hahns5.2; Oct 24, 2010 at 08:29 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 09:43 PM
  #8  
Gaius's Avatar
Gaius
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: Beaverton, OR
Default

Originally Posted by Hahns5.2
You can't swap the flywheel/flex plates on the 5.2 and 5.9 due to balancing issues so be sure to get the correct ones for your swap.
Good to know. I also realized I won't be able swap the ECUs, with one as an auto, and one a manual. Doubt it will be cost productive after buying two ECUs, a 5.2 flywheel, and 5.9 flex plate. Damn.

Might as well just buy a 5.9 longblock and rebuild that for the Ram if I feel I need to later. Also could swap in an NV4500 later.

Thanks, all.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 09:48 PM
  #9  
redheadhunter21's Avatar
redheadhunter21
Champion
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,831
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Fl
Default

I would leave the motors alone if it were me, only going to start more problems then needed, you could get some HS 1.7 RR's and a sct tuner and should be close too if not over the power of the 5.9, and a tuneup, new precat O2 sensor, and fixing the plenum if not done should help the mpg on the 5.9
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 10:22 PM
  #10  
RM_Indy's Avatar
RM_Indy
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 3
From: Ontario Canada
Default

What gears do you have in the 5.2?
Hope its not 3.55
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:07 PM.