2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

180* Thermostats... Pro's and Con's..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 11-30-2011, 06:49 PM
Gary-L's Avatar
Gary-L
Gary-L is offline
Legend
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,648
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gdstock
So I had my wife take her car to the local Goodyear shop yesterday to have the oil changed (I'm too busy working on my Ram to do it myself). Of course they rotate the tires, check fluids, etc.

So she calls me (ready for this, unregistered?) and says that John told her the WIPER BLADES are starting to fall apart and wants to know what type I want to put on! (grinning....)
http://www.wipers123.com

I'm running the Trico Neoform wipers on my Mazda and my Crown Victoria. Great wipers and great prices. They even throw freebies in the box as well!
 
  #32  
Old 11-30-2011, 06:49 PM
zman17's Avatar
zman17
zman17 is offline
Retired Moderator - RIP
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NH
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Since the o2's are heated, I don't think they wait for the motor itself to be at full operating temp before the PCM goes or puts it/them into closed loop. The exhaust get's hotter much quicker.
 
  #33  
Old 11-30-2011, 11:48 PM
jswain's Avatar
jswain
jswain is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So has anyone tested the theory that you get worse fuel mileage with a 180 t-stat and stock tune versus a 195 t-stat and stock tune? It would seem to me if someone real world tested the two different temp thermostats and the fuel mileage remained the same, there would be no advantage to keeping the stock thermostat, other than it might take longer for the cab to heat up. Possibly someone with a tuner and a 180 could go back to the stock tune and compare their mileage to what they were getting with say the 87 tune. And for the record, I have a 192 thermostat, so I guess I'd be a poor test subject. Maybe someone could write MythBusters a letter about thermostats in Dodge trucks. They could do a whole show. No one would watch it but us.
 
  #34  
Old 11-30-2011, 11:59 PM
a-master's Avatar
a-master
a-master is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Me likey. Sticky sticky.


Originally Posted by jswain
No one would watch it but us.
No greater truth has ever been heard by man.
 

Last edited by a-master; 12-01-2011 at 12:02 AM.
  #35  
Old 12-01-2011, 12:47 AM
Hylander7's Avatar
Hylander7
Hylander7 is offline
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: California
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jswain
So has anyone tested the theory that you get worse fuel mileage with a 180 t-stat and stock tune versus a 195 t-stat and stock tune? .
I'm in the process of doing that.
I have my results using the 180* Stat
Fuel = 87 Octane
95% in town driving = 8.57 mpg
100% HWY = 11.17 mpg
Elevation = 100 ft.

I have now installed the 195* Stat.
100% Town driving = 10.58
 

Last edited by Hylander7; 12-03-2011 at 03:39 PM.
  #36  
Old 12-01-2011, 01:04 AM
jswain's Avatar
jswain
jswain is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hylander7
I'm in the process of doing that.
I have my results using the 180* Stat
Fuel = 87 Octane
95% in town driving = 8.5 mpg
100% HWY = 11.4 mpg
Elevation = 100 ft.

I have now installed the 195* Stat.
I will run a couple of tanks of gas and give a report.
Cool.

Your gas mileage with the 180 looks a little low (assuming stock tire size, yadda, yadda). I'm getting about 12.5 mpg mixed (65 hwy/35 city) with 5.9, auto, 4 X 4, 265 tires, stock t-stat (well 192) and stock tune.

Z- man is right, I should really update my signature to avoid typing all that info over and over. He may give me sass for it.
 
  #37  
Old 12-01-2011, 01:35 AM
Hylander7's Avatar
Hylander7
Hylander7 is offline
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: California
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jswain
Cool.

Your gas mileage with the 180 looks a little low (assuming stock tire size, yadda, yadda). I'm getting about 12.5 mpg mixed (65 hwy/35 city) with 5.9, auto, 4 X 4, 265 tires, stock t-stat (well 192) and stock tune.

Z- man is right, I should really update my signature to avoid typing all that info over and over. He may give me sass for it.
Updated my Sig to reflect my Rigs setup
 
  #38  
Old 12-01-2011, 08:04 AM
Augiedoggy's Avatar
Augiedoggy
Augiedoggy is offline
Champion
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Western NY,
Posts: 3,014
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hylander7
I'm in the process of doing that.
I have my results using the 180* Stat
Fuel = 87 Octane
95% in town driving = 8.5 mpg
100% HWY = 11.4 mpg
Elevation = 100 ft.

I have now installed the 195* Stat.
I will run a couple of tanks of gas and give a report.
Ok but I'm thinking something else has to be wrong with your truck because I have 35" tires and 4.56 gears and get better mileage with my 180 stat....I'm not sure on the city mileage but I get just over 13mpg highway the last time I calculated...
Is your truck stock? besides the stat?
 

Last edited by Augiedoggy; 12-01-2011 at 08:07 AM.
  #39  
Old 12-01-2011, 08:13 AM
drewactual's Avatar
drewactual
drewactual is offline
Champion
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cape Carteret NC
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zman17
Since the o2's are heated, I don't think they wait for the motor itself to be at full operating temp before the PCM goes or puts it/them into closed loop. The exhaust get's hotter much quicker.
I think the PCM starts polling that data almost instantly.. it just doesn't do anything with it.. 'round about 120*, the sensors start fluttering in and out.. about 140*, they take over, and the little indicator toggles over to 'closed loop'.. it isn't ALWAYS at 140*.. Sometimes it's later, but it is always before 150*..

the part that I don't get, is that the 'stfc' doesn't start adjusting until the temperature reaches 175* or so.. what's the term? Latency maybe? It may be the computer I'm using having lag time (latency?) between it and the PCM, but I don't think it is, because I see other things real time- like an area of cooler or hotter air as I drive through it.. I think the o2's take over at 175~180*..

I don't know this next bit is a fact, but I highly suspect if I were running the factory tune (death flash and all), the o2's wouldn't take the con until 190~195*..
 
  #40  
Old 12-01-2011, 10:27 AM
Hylander7's Avatar
Hylander7
Hylander7 is offline
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: California
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Augiedoggy
Ok but I'm thinking something else has to be wrong with your truck because I have 35" tires and 4.56 gears and get better mileage with my 180 stat....I'm not sure on the city mileage but I get just over 13mpg highway the last time I calculated...
Is your truck stock? besides the stat?
3.5" Lift, 33x12.5-15 Toyo's, 4:10's, JBA Headers, 14x3, 3" Catback, Flowmaster Dual Exit

Could the IAT or 02 have an effect ?
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 AM.